000866591 001__ 866591
000866591 005__ 20210130003533.0
000866591 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.035
000866591 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0034-4257
000866591 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1879-0704
000866591 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000484643900067
000866591 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-05672
000866591 041__ $$aEnglish
000866591 082__ $$a550
000866591 1001_ $$00000-0002-7689-3031$$aLiu, Xinjie$$b0
000866591 245__ $$aDownscaling of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence from canopy level to photosystem level using a random forest model
000866591 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2019
000866591 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000866591 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000866591 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1574344197_25089
000866591 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000866591 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000866591 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000866591 520__ $$aSolar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), an electromagnetic signal that can potentially indicate vegetation photosynthetic activity, can be retrieved from ground-based, airborne and satellite measurements. However, due to the scattering and re-absorption effects inside the leaves and canopy, SIF measured at the canopy level is only a small part of the total SIF emission at the photosystem level. Therefore, a downscaling mechanism of SIF from the canopy level to the photosystem level is important for better understanding the relationship between SIF and the vegetation gross primary production (GPP). In this study, firstly, we analyzed the canopy scattering effects using a simple parameterization model based on the spectral invariant theory. The probability for SIF photons to escape from the canopy was found to be related to the anisotropic spectral reflectance, canopy interception of the upward solar radiation, and leaf absorption. An empirical approach based on a Random Forest (RF) regression algorithm was applied to downscale SIF constrained by the red, red-edge and far-red anisotropic reflectance. The RF was trained using simulations conducted with the Soil Canopy Observation, Photochemistry and Energy fluxes (SCOPE) model. The performance of the SIF downscaling method was evaluated with SCOPE and Discrete Anisotropic Radiative Transfer (DART) model simulations, ground measurements and airborne data. Results show that estimated SIF at the photosystem level matches well with simulated reference data, and the relationship between SIF and photosynthetically active radiation absorbed by chlorophyll is improved by SIF downscaling. This finding in combination with other evaluation criteria suggests the downscaling of canopy SIF as an efficient strategy to normalize species dependent effects of canopy structure and varying solar-view geometries. Based on our results for the SIF-APAR relationship, we expect that such normalization approaches can be helpful to improve estimates of photosynthesis using remote sensing measurements of SIF.
000866591 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$a582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)$$cPOF3-582$$fPOF III$$x0
000866591 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000866591 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGuanter, Luis$$b1
000866591 7001_ $$00000-0002-7987-037X$$aLiu, Liangyun$$b2$$eCorresponding author
000866591 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDamm, Alexander$$b3
000866591 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMalenovský, Zbyněk$$b4
000866591 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129388$$aRascher, Uwe$$b5
000866591 7001_ $$00000-0003-1159-0723$$aPeng, Dailiang$$b6
000866591 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDu, Shanshan$$b7
000866591 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGastellu-Etchegorry, Jean-Philippe$$b8
000866591 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1498713-2$$a10.1016/j.rse.2018.05.035$$gVol. 231, p. 110772 -$$p110772 -$$tRemote sensing of environment$$v231$$x0034-4257$$y2019
000866591 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:866591$$pVDB
000866591 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129388$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b5$$kFZJ
000866591 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lKey Technologies for the Bioeconomy$$vPlant Science$$x0
000866591 9141_ $$y2019
000866591 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000866591 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000866591 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bREMOTE SENS ENVIRON : 2017
000866591 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000866591 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000866591 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000866591 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000866591 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000866591 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000866591 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000866591 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
000866591 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000866591 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9905$$2StatID$$aIF >= 5$$bREMOTE SENS ENVIRON : 2017
000866591 920__ $$lyes
000866591 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118$$kIBG-2$$lPflanzenwissenschaften$$x0
000866591 980__ $$ajournal
000866591 980__ $$aVDB
000866591 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000866591 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED