% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Caglayan:866635,
author = {Caglayan, Dilara Gülcin and Weber, Nikolaus and Heinrichs,
Heidi and Linssen, Jochen and Robinius, Martin and Kukla,
Peter and Stolten, Detlef},
title = {{T}echnical {P}otential of {S}alt {C}averns for {H}ydrogen
{S}torage in {E}urope},
journal = {International journal of hydrogen energy},
volume = {45},
number = {11},
issn = {0360-3199},
address = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2019-05714},
pages = {6793 - 6805},
year = {2020},
abstract = {The role of hydrogen in a future energy system with a high
share of variable renewable energy sources (VRES) is
regarded as crucial in order to balance fluctuations in
electricity generation. These fluctuations can be
compensated for by flexibility measures such as the
expansion of transmission, flexible generation, larger
back-up capacity and storage. Salt cavern storage is the
most promising technology due to its large storage capacity,
followed by pumped hydro storage. For the underground
storage of chemical energy carriers such as hydrogen, salt
caverns offer the most promising option owing to their low
investment cost, high sealing potential and low cushion gas
requirement. This paper provides a suitability assessment of
European subsurface salt structures in terms of size, land
eligibility and storage capacity. Two distinct cavern
volumes of 500,000 m3 and 750,000 m3 are considered, with
preference being given for salt caverns over bedded salt
deposits and salt domes. The storage capacities of
individual caverns are estimated on the basis of
thermodynamic considerations based on site-specific data.
The results are analyzed using three different scenarios:
onshore and offshore salt caverns, only onshore salt caverns
and only onshore caverns within 50 km of the shore. The
overall technical storage potential across Europe is
estimated at 84.8 PWhH2, $27\%$ of which constitutes only
onshore locations. Furthermore, this capacity decreases to
7.3 PWhH2 with a limitation of 50 km distance from shore. In
all cases, Germany has the highest technical storage
potential, with a value of 9.4 PWhH2, located onshore only
in salt domes in the north of the country. Moreover, Norway
has 7.5 PWhH2 of storage potential for offshore caverns,
which are all located in the subsurface of the North Sea
Basin.},
cin = {IEK-3},
ddc = {620},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
pnm = {134 - Electrolysis and Hydrogen (POF3-134) / ES2050 -
Energie Sytem 2050 (ES2050)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134 / G:(DE-HGF)ES2050},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000519652800069},
doi = {10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.161},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/866635},
}