% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Huang:866636,
      author       = {Huang, Zhongyi and Chraibi, Mohcine and Cao, Shuchao and
                      Huang, Chuanli and Fang, Zhiming and Song, Weiguo},
      title        = {{A} microscopic method for the evaluating of continuous
                      pedestrian dynamic models},
      journal      = {Physica / A Statistical mechanics and its applications A},
      volume       = {536},
      issn         = {0378-4371},
      address      = {Amsterdam},
      publisher    = {North Holland Publ. Co.},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-05715},
      pages        = {122461 -},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {In this paper, we propose a microscopic method to evaluate
                      continuous pedestrian dynamic models at the trajectory
                      level. By comparing the experimental and the simulated
                      trajectory in four directions, the evaluation of the model
                      can be described by a radar chart, with which both
                      qualitative and quantitative conclusions can be obtained. In
                      order to demonstrate our method, we evaluate a social force
                      model by 1,936 trajectories with graded densities in three
                      different scenarios. Three qualitative conclusions are
                      obtained by observing radar charts of the simulation of the
                      unidirectional experiments. All of them are verified by the
                      comparison of the macroscopic parameters. Besides, we find
                      that a model with smaller error in our method always has a
                      better performance at the macroscopic level. At last, the
                      possible quantitative descriptions of the method are
                      discussed. Compared to the evaluations by comparing
                      collective features like fundamental diagram, our method is
                      general, comprehensive and quantitative. The method provides
                      a new possibility to evaluate any continuous pedestrian
                      dynamic model in any scenario with a standard process.},
      cin          = {IAS-7},
      ddc          = {500},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321},
      pnm          = {511 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods
                      (POF3-511)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000500034900013},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.physa.2019.122461},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/866636},
}