% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Gama:866668,
      author       = {Gama, C. and Ribeiro, I. and Lange, A. C. and Vogel, A. and
                      Ascenso, A. and Seixas, V. and Elbern, H. and Borrego, C.
                      and Friese, E. and Monteiro, A.},
      title        = {{P}erformance assessment of {CHIMERE} and {EURAD}-{IM}’
                      dust modules},
      journal      = {Atmospheric pollution research},
      volume       = {10},
      number       = {4},
      issn         = {1309-1042},
      address      = {Blackburn, Vic.},
      publisher    = {TUNCAP},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-05747},
      pages        = {1336 - 1346},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {The purpose of this study is to investigate how two
                      different atmospheric 3D modelling systems, with different
                      dust modules, simulate a Saharan dust episode, using
                      satellite data and in-situ observations to validate their
                      performances. The episode occurred during 19–23 February
                      2016 and impacted the Iberian Peninsula. The two numerical
                      modelling systems applied are the CHIMERE and the EURAD-IM
                      chemistry transport models with different dust modules, both
                      forced by the same WRF meteorological input. A common domain
                      and resolution (27 × 27 km2) was adopted for the
                      modelling setup. The comparison and evaluation of the two
                      modelling results have shown that both models are able to
                      capture the occurrence of the natural event, which was
                      initiated by a cut-off low above the coast of Morocco,
                      inducing a strong meridional transport of dust loaded air
                      from Algeria straight towards eastern parts of the Iberian
                      Peninsula. The most notable differences between the two
                      model outputs concern the emission strengths and the
                      emission source regions. In fact, different emission
                      patterns and strengths are simulated by each model despite
                      they use the same soil database, identical clay/silt/sand
                      contribution for each soil type, and the same meteorological
                      simulation. In general, CHIMERE simulates higher PM10,
                      PM2.5, and dust concentrations than EURAD-IM for this event.
                      In the South of Portugal, CHIMERE shows better agreement
                      with observations, while in Central Portugal, EURAD-IM is
                      closer to particle related measurements.},
      cin          = {IEK-8 / JARA-HPC},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013 / $I:(DE-82)080012_20140620$},
      pnm          = {243 - Tropospheric trace substances and their
                      transformation processes (POF3-243) / CAMS,HITEC,ESKP,
                      REKLIM+,UBA $(jicg21_20180501)$},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243 / $G:(DE-Juel1)jicg21_20180501$},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000472996900031},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.apr.2019.03.005},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/866668},
}