% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{RangelHernndez:866746,
      author       = {Rangel-Hernández, Victor and Belman-Flores, J. M. and
                      Perez-Garcia, V. and Mendez-Mendez, D.},
      title        = {{A}n {A}dvanced {E}xergoeconomic {C}omparison of
                      {CO}2-{B}ased {T}ranscritical {R}efrigeration {C}ycles},
      journal      = {Energies},
      volume       = {13},
      number       = {23},
      issn         = {1996-1073},
      address      = {Basel},
      publisher    = {MDPI},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-05815},
      pages        = {6454 -},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {CO2-based transcritical refrigeration cycles are currently
                      gaining significant research attention, as they offer a
                      viable solution to the use of natural refrigerants (e.g.,
                      CO2). However, there are almost no papers that offer an
                      exergoeconomic comparison between the different
                      configurations of these types of systems. Accordingly, the
                      present work deals with a comparative exergoeconomic
                      analysis of four different CO2-based transcritical
                      refrigeration cycles. In addition, the work is complemented
                      by an analysis of the CO2 abatement costs. The influences of
                      the variation of the evaporating temperature, the gas cooler
                      outlet temperature, and the pressure ratio on the exergy
                      efficiency, product cost rate, exergy destruction cost rate,
                      exergoeconomic factor, and CO2 penalty cost rate are
                      compared in detail. The results show that the transcritical
                      cycle with the ejector has the lowest exergetic product cost
                      and a low environmental impact},
      cin          = {IEK-14},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-14-20191129},
      pnm          = {1231 - Electrochemistry for Hydrogen (POF4-123)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-1231},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000597088100001},
      doi          = {10.3390/en13236454},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/866746},
}