000867276 001__ 867276
000867276 005__ 20240711085656.0
000867276 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1039/C9RA00765B
000867276 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/23667
000867276 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000466756100035
000867276 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-06034
000867276 082__ $$a540
000867276 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aZhu, Guanzhou$$b0
000867276 245__ $$aRechargeable aluminum batteries: effects of cations in ionic liquid electrolytes
000867276 260__ $$aLondon$$bRSC Publishing$$c2019
000867276 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000867276 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000867276 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1576592993_32085
000867276 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000867276 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000867276 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000867276 520__ $$aRoom temperature ionic liquids (RTILs) are solvent-free liquids comprised of densely packed cations and anions. The low vapor pressure and low flammability make ILs interesting for electrolytes in batteries. In this work, a new class of ionic liquids were formed for rechargeable aluminum/graphite battery electrolytes by mixing 1-methyl-1-propylpyrrolidinium chloride (Py13Cl) with various ratios of aluminum chloride (AlCl3) (AlCl3/Py13Cl molar ratio = 1.4 to 1.7). Fundamental properties of the ionic liquids, including density, viscosity, conductivity, anion concentrations and electrolyte ion percent were investigated and compared with the previously investigated 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride (EMIC-AlCl3) ionic liquids. The results showed that the Py13Cl–AlCl3 ionic liquid exhibited lower density, higher viscosity and lower conductivity than its EMIC-AlCl3 counterpart. We devised a Raman scattering spectroscopy method probing ILs over a Si substrate, and by using the Si Raman scattering peak for normalization, we quantified speciation including AlCl4−, Al2Cl7−, and larger AlCl3 related species with the general formula (AlCl3)n in different IL electrolytes. We found that larger (AlCl3)n species existed only in the Py13Cl–AlCl3 system. We propose that the larger cationic size of Py13+ (142 Å3) versus EMI+ (118 Å3) dictated the differences in the chemical and physical properties of the two ionic liquids. Both ionic liquids were used as electrolytes for aluminum–graphite batteries, with the performances of batteries compared. The chloroaluminate anion-graphite charging capacity and cycling stability of the two batteries were similar. The Py13Cl–AlCl3 based battery showed a slightly larger overpotential than EMIC-AlCl3, leading to lower energy efficiency resulting from higher viscosity and lower conductivity. The results here provide fundamental insights into ionic liquid electrolyte design for optimal battery performance.
000867276 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131$$a131 - Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131)$$cPOF3-131$$fPOF III$$x0
000867276 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000867276 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAngell, Michael$$b1
000867276 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPan, Chun-Jern$$b2
000867276 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLin, Meng-Chang$$b3
000867276 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aChen, Hui$$b4
000867276 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHuang, Chen-Jui$$b5
000867276 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLin, Jinuan$$b6
000867276 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAchazi, Andreas J.$$b7
000867276 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)174502$$aKaghazchi, Payam$$b8$$ufzj
000867276 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHwang, Bing-Joe$$b9
000867276 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDai, Hongjie$$b10$$eCorresponding author
000867276 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2623224-8$$a10.1039/C9RA00765B$$gVol. 9, no. 20, p. 11322 - 11330$$n20$$p11322 - 11330$$tRSC Advances$$v9$$x2046-2069$$y2019
000867276 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/867276/files/c9ra00765b.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000867276 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/867276/files/c9ra00765b.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000867276 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:867276$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000867276 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)174502$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b8$$kFZJ
000867276 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bEnergie$$lSpeicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen$$vElectrochemical Storage$$x0
000867276 9141_ $$y2019
000867276 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
000867276 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000867276 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bRSC ADV : 2017
000867276 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000867276 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000867276 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000867276 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000867276 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000867276 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000867276 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review
000867276 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
000867276 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000867276 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0430$$2StatID$$aNational-Konsortium
000867276 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000867276 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000867276 920__ $$lyes
000867276 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-1-20101013$$kIEK-1$$lWerkstoffsynthese und Herstellungsverfahren$$x0
000867276 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000867276 980__ $$ajournal
000867276 980__ $$aVDB
000867276 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000867276 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-1-20101013
000867276 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IMD-2-20101013