% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{GrossBarsnick:867594,
      author       = {Gross-Barsnick, S.-M. and Margaritis, N. and de Haart, U.
                      and Huczkowski, P. and Quadakkers, W. J.},
      title        = {{I}nteraction of a {B}arium-{C}alcium-{S}ilicate {G}lass
                      {C}omposite {S}ealant with {S}anergy {HT} 441},
      journal      = {Fuel cells},
      volume       = {19},
      number       = {4},
      issn         = {1615-6846},
      address      = {Weinheim},
      publisher    = {Wiley-VCH},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2019-06215},
      pages        = {494 - 502},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {The interaction between Sandvik's coated Sanergy HT 441 (EN
                      1.4509) with a cerium‐cobalt layer as chromium evaporation
                      barrier and a glass‐ceramic composite sealant on the basis
                      of BaO‐CaO‐SiO2 was investigated in this study. The
                      oxidation behavior of the steel was analyzed by long‐term
                      weight change measurements of strip samples at 800 °C for
                      10,000 h followed by scanning electron microscopy on
                      cross‐sectioned samples. A double oxide layer was formed
                      consisting of chromia close to the steel and a layer with
                      $18 wt.\%$ Cr, $11\%$ Co, $10\%$ Mn to the air side. The
                      interface of the joined samples had a reaction layer similar
                      to the oxidized steel surface with an additional phase
                      formation consisting of Co/Mn/Fe and low in oxygen facing
                      the glass‐ceramic interface. After these preliminary tests
                      the coated Sanergy HT 441 was integrated as frames into a
                      four layered F10‐stack with 80 cm2 cell area and was
                      tested for 3,500 h at operation temperature of 700 °C and
                      0.5 A cm−2 constant current mode followed by 20 thermal
                      cycles between 700 and 200 °C. The stack had shown
                      similar performance and gas‐tightness compared to stacks
                      assembled with Crofer 22 APU. The post‐test
                      characterization had shown adhesive fracture patterns when
                      dismantling the stack parts.},
      cin          = {IEK-2 / ZEA-1 / IEK-3},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-2-20101013 / I:(DE-Juel1)ZEA-1-20090406 /
                      I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
      pnm          = {113 - Methods and Concepts for Material Development
                      (POF3-113)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-113},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000474062000001},
      doi          = {10.1002/fuce.201800191},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/867594},
}