000867682 001__ 867682
000867682 005__ 20210130003833.0
000867682 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.agee.2019.03.004
000867682 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0167-8809
000867682 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1873-2305
000867682 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:58101609
000867682 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000482173500009
000867682 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-06298
000867682 041__ $$aEnglish
000867682 082__ $$a640
000867682 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSiebert, Julia$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000867682 245__ $$aEarthworms modulate the effects of climate warming on the taxon richness of soil meso- and macrofauna in an agricultural system
000867682 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier$$c2019
000867682 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000867682 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000867682 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1582031202_32368
000867682 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000867682 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000867682 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000867682 520__ $$aAnthropogenic climate change is altering the functioning of terrestrial ecosystems. Agricultural systems are particularly vulnerable to climate change as they are frequently disturbed by intensified management practices. This also threatens belowground organisms that are responsible for providing crucial ecosystem functions and services, such as nutrient cycling and plant disease suppression. Amongst these organisms, earthworms are of particular importance as they can modulate the effects of climate change on soil organisms by modifying the biotic and abiotic soil conditions. However, they are also known to decline under intensified management, justifying their use as key biotic indicators of intensified agriculture. Yet, our knowledge of the responses of belowground species to the interacting effects of warming and land-use intensification (simulated by earthworm reduction in the experimental setup) remains limited. Here, we tested the interactive effects of soil warming and reduced earthworm densities on soil protists, nematodes, meso- and macrofauna, and their diversity in a common barley system in the Hohenheim Climate Change Experiment. We found that belowground species richness was lowest at elevated temperature and reduced earthworm densities, indicating that earthworms can buffer warming effects on belowground biodiversity. Furthermore, warming increased the densities of plant-feeding nematodes, and herbivorous macrofauna benefitted from reduced earthworm densities. Our results indicate that warming and reduced earthworm densities may simultaneously modify the functioning and service provisioning of soils via shifts in diversity and density of soil biota that would likely lead to simplified belowground food webs. These findings thus highlight the importance of maintaining greater densities of ecosystem engineers like earthworms that may help buffering the detrimental effects of climate warming in agricultural systems.
000867682 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$a582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)$$cPOF3-582$$fPOF III$$x0
000867682 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000867682 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aEisenhauer, Nico$$b1
000867682 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPoll, Christian$$b2
000867682 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMarhan, Sven$$b3
000867682 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBonkowski, Michael$$b4
000867682 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHines, Jes$$b5
000867682 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)165733$$aKoller, Robert$$b6
000867682 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRuess, Liliane$$b7
000867682 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aThakur, Madhav P.$$b8
000867682 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2013743-6$$a10.1016/j.agee.2019.03.004$$gVol. 278, p. 72 - 80$$p72 - 80$$tAgriculture, ecosystems & environment$$v278$$x0167-8809$$y2019
000867682 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:867682$$pVDB
000867682 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)165733$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b6$$kFZJ
000867682 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lKey Technologies for the Bioeconomy$$vPlant Science$$x0
000867682 9141_ $$y2019
000867682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000867682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bAGR ECOSYST ENVIRON : 2017
000867682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000867682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000867682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000867682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000867682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000867682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000867682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000867682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000867682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000867682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000867682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record
000867682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000867682 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000867682 920__ $$lno
000867682 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118$$kIBG-2$$lPflanzenwissenschaften$$x0
000867682 980__ $$ajournal
000867682 980__ $$aVDB
000867682 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000867682 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED