000868040 001__ 868040
000868040 005__ 20220930130225.0
000868040 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3390/nu12010024
000868040 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/23776
000868040 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:31861903
000868040 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000516825500024
000868040 037__ $$aFZJ-2019-06633
000868040 082__ $$a610
000868040 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)165363$$aHöchenberger, Richard$$b0
000868040 245__ $$aRepeatability of Taste Recognition Threshold Measurements with QUEST and Quick Yes–No
000868040 260__ $$aBasel$$bMDPI$$c2020
000868040 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000868040 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000868040 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1578300930_24844
000868040 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000868040 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000868040 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000868040 520__ $$aTaste perception, although vital for nutrient sensing, has long been overlooked in sensory assessments. This can, at least in part, be attributed to challenges associated with the handling of liquid, perishable stimuli, but also with scarce efforts to optimize testing procedures to be more time-efficient. We have previously introduced an adaptive, QUEST-based procedure to measure taste sensitivity thresholds that was quicker than other existing approaches, yet similarly reliable. Despite its advantages, the QUEST procedure lacks experimental control of false alarms (i.e., response bias) and psychometric function slope. Variations of these parameters, however, may also influence the threshold estimate. This raises the question as to whether a procedure that simultaneously assesses threshold, false-alarm rate, and slope might be able to produce threshold estimates with higher repeatability, i.e., smaller variation between repeated measurements. Here, we compared the performance of QUEST with a method that allows measurement of false-alarm rates and slopes, quick Yes–No (qYN), in a test–retest design for citric acid, sodium chloride, quinine hydrochloride, and sucrose recognition thresholds. We used complementary measures of repeatability, namely test–retest correlations and coefficients of repeatability. Both threshold procedures yielded largely overlapping thresholds with good repeatability between measurements. Together the data suggest that participants used a conservative response criterion. Furthermore, we explored the link between taste sensitivity and taste liking or which we found, however, no clear association.
000868040 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$a572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)$$cPOF3-572$$fPOF III$$x0
000868040 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000868040 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)165362$$aOhla, Kathrin$$b1$$eCorresponding author
000868040 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2518386-2$$a10.3390/nu12010024$$gVol. 12, no. 1, p. 24 -$$n1$$p24 $$tNutrients$$v12$$x2072-6643$$y2020
000868040 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/868040/files/Invoice_MDPI_nutrients-658034_1004.08EUR.pdf
000868040 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/868040/files/Invoice_MDPI_nutrients-658034_1004.08EUR.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000868040 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/868040/files/nutrients-12-00024.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000868040 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/868040/files/nutrients-12-00024.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000868040 8767_ $$92019-12-13$$d2020-01-03$$eAPC$$jZahlung erfolgt$$pnutrients-658034
000868040 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:868040$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire$$pdnbdelivery
000868040 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)165363$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000868040 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)165362$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000868040 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$v(Dys-)function and Plasticity$$x0
000868040 9141_ $$y2020
000868040 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000868040 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000868040 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000868040 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bNUTRIENTS : 2017
000868040 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000868040 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000868040 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000868040 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000868040 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000868040 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000868040 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review
000868040 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000868040 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000868040 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central
000868040 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000868040 920__ $$lyes
000868040 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000868040 980__ $$ajournal
000868040 980__ $$aVDB
000868040 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000868040 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
000868040 980__ $$aAPC
000868040 9801_ $$aAPC
000868040 9801_ $$aFullTexts