% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Jording:868235,
author = {Jording, Mathis and Engemann, Denis and Eckert, Hannah and
Bente, Gary and Vogeley, Kai},
title = {{D}istinguishing {S}ocial {F}rom {P}rivate {I}ntentions
{T}hrough the {P}assive {O}bservation of {G}aze {C}ues},
journal = {Frontiers in human neuroscience},
volume = {13},
issn = {1662-5161},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
reportid = {FZJ-2019-06796},
pages = {442},
year = {2019},
abstract = {Observing others’ gaze is most informative during social
encounters between humans: We can learn about potentially
salient objects in the shared environment, infer others’
mental states and detect their communicative intentions. We
almost automatically follow the gaze of others in order to
check the relevance of the target of the other’s
attention. This phenomenon called gaze cueing can be
conceptualized as a triadic interaction involving a gaze
initiator, a gaze follower and a gaze target, i.e., an
object or person of interest in the environment. Gaze cueing
can occur as “gaze pointing” with a communicative or
“social” intention by the initiator, telling the
observer that she/he is meant to follow, or as an incidental
event, in which the observer follows spontaneously without
any intention of the observed person. Here, we investigate
which gaze cues let an observer ascribe a social intention
to the observed person’s gaze and whether and to which
degree previous eye contact in combination with an object
fixation contributes to this ascription. We varied the
orientation of the starting position of gaze toward the
observer and the orientation of the end position of a
lateral gaze shift. In two experiments participants had to
infer from the gaze behavior either mere approach (“the
person looked at me”) vs. a social (“the person wanted
to show me something”) or a social vs. a private
motivation (“the person was interested in something”).
Participants differentially attributed either approach
behavior, a social, or a private intention to the agent
solely based on the passive observation of the two specific
gaze cues of start and end position. While for the
attribution of privately motivated behavior, participants
relied solely on the end position of the gaze shift, the
social interpretation of the observed behavior depended
additionally upon initial eye contact. Implications of these
results for future social gaze and social cognition research
in general are discussed.},
cin = {INM-3},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
pnm = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:31920600},
UT = {WOS:000504999600001},
doi = {10.3389/fnhum.2019.00442},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/868235},
}