% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Schnell:872556,
      author       = {Schnell, Joscha and Tietz, Frank and Singer, Célestine and
                      Hofer, Andreas and Billot, Nicolas and Reinhart, Gunther},
      title        = {{P}rospects of production technologies and manufacturing
                      costs of oxide-based all-solid-state lithium batteries},
      journal      = {Energy $\&$ environmental science},
      volume       = {12},
      number       = {6},
      issn         = {1754-5706},
      address      = {Cambridge},
      publisher    = {RSC Publ.},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-00062},
      pages        = {1818 - 1833},
      year         = {2019},
      abstract     = {All-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) based on oxide solid
                      electrolytes are promising future candidates for safer
                      batteries with high energy density. In order to estimate the
                      future manufacturing cost for oxide based ASSBs, a
                      systematic identification and evaluation of technologies in
                      solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and multi-layer ceramic
                      capacitor (MLCC) production has been carried out. Based on a
                      requirements analysis, these technologies are assessed
                      towards their applicability in the production of ASSBs. The
                      most promising technologies are compared by technology
                      readiness using Monte-Carlo simulations. The comprehensive
                      overview and systematic analysis of production scenarios for
                      oxide-based ASSBs reveals significant advantages of
                      established wet coating technologies, such as tape casting
                      and screen printing. However, emerging technologies, such as
                      the aerosol deposition method, could render the high
                      temperature sintering step void. By comparison with SOFC
                      production and adopting learning rates from conventional
                      battery production, an estimation for the manufacturing cost
                      of a garnet-based ASSB is given, indicating that prices
                      below 150 $ kW−1 h−1 at the cell level (incl. housing)
                      are conceivable if the material cost for the garnet solid
                      electrolyte can be pushed below 60 $ kg−1. Based on these
                      findings, scenarios for the scale-up from laboratory
                      research to industrial scale can be derived, paving the way
                      to mass production of safer batteries with high energy
                      density.},
      cin          = {IEK-1},
      ddc          = {690},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-1-20101013},
      pnm          = {131 - Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000471283100005},
      doi          = {10.1039/C8EE02692K},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/872556},
}