% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Morgenthaler:872557,
      author       = {Morgenthaler, Simon and Kuckshinrichs, Wilhelm and
                      Witthaut, Dirk},
      title        = {{O}ptimal system layout and locations for fully renewable
                      high temperature co-electrolysis},
      journal      = {Applied energy},
      volume       = {260},
      issn         = {0306-2619},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-00063},
      pages        = {114218 -},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {High temperature co-electrolysis can be a promising
                      technology for the transformation of energy systems as it
                      enables sector coupling and carbon dioxide utilization. In
                      this article, we analyze the optimal layout and operation of
                      distributed electrolysis sites powered exclusively by local
                      renewable energy sources and a local battery storage device
                      for current techno-economic parameters. For this purpose an
                      energy system model with a spatial resolution of 277 regions
                      within Europe is set up, which facilitates the analysis of
                      intermittent renewable electricity generation, a battery
                      storage device and the innovative high temperature
                      co-electrolysis. We discuss the techno-economic
                      competitiveness and analyze potential leverage points for
                      improvement such as an enhanced flexibility. The lowest
                      costs are found in Lincolnshire with 0.24 €/kWh and the
                      highest costs in Central Slovakia with 0.49 €/kWh
                      differing by more than a factor of two. Remarkably, several
                      locations with vastly different resources and layouts lead
                      to a similar techno-economic performance of the investigated
                      system. We compare the techno-economic performance of high
                      temperature co-electrolysis with steam methane reforming as
                      the conventional synthesis gas production route.},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
                      Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153) /
                      VH-NG-1025 - Helmholtz Young Investigators Group
                      "Efficiency, Emergence and Economics of future supply
                      networks" $(VH-NG-1025_20112014)$ / P2X - Power-To-X
                      (POWER-2-X-2016)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153 / $G:(HGF)VH-NG-1025_20112014$ /
                      G:(DE-Juel1)POWER-2-X-2016},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000515108700096},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114218},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/872557},
}