000872612 001__ 872612
000872612 005__ 20210130004234.0
000872612 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1093/gji/ggz515
000872612 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0016-8009
000872612 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0955-419X
000872612 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0956-540X
000872612 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1365-246X
000872612 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a2056-5216
000872612 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/24072
000872612 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:70701094
000872612 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000506848400029
000872612 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-00105
000872612 082__ $$a550
000872612 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)172900$$aIzumoto, Satoshi$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000872612 245__ $$aEffect of solute concentration on the spectral induced polarization response of calcite precipitation
000872612 260__ $$aOxford$$bOxford Univ. Press$$c2020
000872612 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000872612 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000872612 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1580285626_20520
000872612 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000872612 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000872612 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000872612 520__ $$aInduced calcite precipitation is used in geotechnics to modify the mechanical and hydrological properties of the underground. Laboratory experiments have shown that spectral induced polarization (SIP) measurements can detect calcite precipitation. However, the results of previous studies investigating the SIP response of calcite precipitation were not fully consistent. This study aims to investigate how the SIP response of calcite depends on solute concentration to explain the differences in SIP response observed in previous studies. A four-phase experiment with SIP measurements on a column filled with sand was performed. In phase I, calcite precipitation was generated for a period of 12 d by co-injecting Na2CO3 and CaCl2 solutions through two different ports. This resulted in a well-defined calcite precipitation front, which was associated with an increase in the imaginary part of the conductivity (⁠σ′′⁠). In phase II, diluted solutions were injected into the column. This resulted in a clear decrease in σ′′⁠. In phase III, the injection of the two solutions was stopped while calcite precipitation continued and solute concentrations in the mixing zone decreased. Again, this decreased σ′′⁠. Finally, the injection rate of the Na2CO3 solution was reduced relative to that of the CaCl2 solution in phase IV. This resulted in a shift of the mixing zone away from the calcite precipitation front established in phase I and an associated decrease of σ′′⁠. These results imply that the SIP response of calcite is highly sensitive to the solute concentration near the precipitates, which may explain previously reported conflicting results.
000872612 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000872612 536__ $$0G:(EU-Grant)722028$$aENIGMA - European training Network for In situ imaGing of dynaMic processes in heterogeneous subsurfAce environments (722028)$$c722028$$fH2020-MSCA-ITN-2016$$x1
000872612 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000872612 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129472$$aHuisman, Johan Alexander$$b1$$ufzj
000872612 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWu, Yuxin$$b2
000872612 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aVereecken, Harry$$b3$$ufzj
000872612 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2006420-2$$a10.1093/gji/ggz515$$gp. ggz515$$n2$$p1187-1196$$tGeophysical journal international$$v220$$x1365-246X$$y2020
000872612 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/872612/files/Manuscript_fin-1.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000872612 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/872612/files/ggz515.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000872612 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/872612/files/Manuscript_fin-1.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000872612 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/872612/files/ggz515.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000872612 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:872612$$pdnbdelivery$$pec_fundedresources$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000872612 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)172900$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000872612 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129472$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000872612 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129549$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000872612 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000872612 9141_ $$y2020
000872612 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000872612 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000872612 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bGEOPHYS J INT : 2017
000872612 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000872612 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000872612 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000872612 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000872612 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000872612 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000872612 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
000872612 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000872612 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000872612 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000872612 920__ $$lyes
000872612 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000872612 980__ $$ajournal
000872612 980__ $$aVDB
000872612 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000872612 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000872612 9801_ $$aFullTexts