% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Greuel:872731,
author = {Greuel, Andrea and Pauls, K. Amande M. and Koy, Anne and
Südmeyer, Martin and Schnitzler, Alfons and Timmermann,
Lars and Fink, Gereon R. and Eggers, Carsten},
title = {{P}allidal {D}eep {B}rain {S}timulation {R}educes
{S}ensorimotor {C}ortex {A}ctivation in {F}ocal/{S}egmental
{D}ystonia},
journal = {Movement disorders},
volume = {35},
number = {4},
issn = {1531-8257},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {Wiley},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-00209},
pages = {629-639},
year = {2020},
abstract = {BackgroundAlthough deep brain stimulation of the globus
pallidus internus (GPi‐DBS) is an established treatment
for many forms of dystonia, including generalized as well as
focal forms, its effects on brain (dys‐)function remain to
be elucidated, particularly for focal and segmental
dystonia. Clinical response to GPi‐DBS typically comes
with some delay and lasts up to several days, sometimes even
weeks, once stimulation is discontinued.ObjectiveThis study
investigated how neural activity during rest and motor
activation is affected by GPi‐DBS while excluding the
potential confound of altered feedback as a result of
therapy‐induced differences in dystonic muscle
contractions.MethodsTwo groups of patients with focal or
segmental dystonia were included in the study: 6 patients
with GPi‐DBS and 8 without DBS (control group). All 14
patients had cervical dystonia. Using H215O PET, regional
cerebral blood flow was measured at rest and during a motor
task performed with a nondystonic hand.ResultsIn patients
with GPi‐DBS (stimulation ON and OFF), activity at rest
was reduced in a prefrontal network, and during the motor
task, sensorimotor cortex activity was lower than in
patients without DBS. Within‐group contrasts (tapping >
rest) showed less extensive task‐induced motor network
activation in GPi‐DBS patients than in non‐DBS controls.
Reduced sensorimotor activation amounted to a significant
group‐by‐task interaction only in the stimulation ON
state.ConclusionsThese findings support previous
observations in generalized dystonia that suggested that
GPi‐DBS normalizes dystonia‐associated sensorimotor and
prefrontal hyperactivity, indicating similar mechanisms in
generalized and focal or segmental dystonia. Evidence is
provided that these effects extend into the OFF state, which
was not previously demonstrated by neuroimaging. © 2020 The
Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals,
Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement
Disorder Society.},
cin = {INM-3},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
pnm = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:31922299},
UT = {WOS:000527001000013},
doi = {10.1002/mds.27970},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/872731},
}