001     872731
005     20210130004257.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1002/mds.27970
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0885-3185
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1531-8257
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/24694
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:73920255
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:31922299
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000527001000013
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-00209
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Greuel, Andrea
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation Reduces Sensorimotor Cortex Activation in Focal/Segmental Dystonia
260 _ _ |a New York, NY
|c 2020
|b Wiley
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1587453554_13267
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a BackgroundAlthough deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus internus (GPi‐DBS) is an established treatment for many forms of dystonia, including generalized as well as focal forms, its effects on brain (dys‐)function remain to be elucidated, particularly for focal and segmental dystonia. Clinical response to GPi‐DBS typically comes with some delay and lasts up to several days, sometimes even weeks, once stimulation is discontinued.ObjectiveThis study investigated how neural activity during rest and motor activation is affected by GPi‐DBS while excluding the potential confound of altered feedback as a result of therapy‐induced differences in dystonic muscle contractions.MethodsTwo groups of patients with focal or segmental dystonia were included in the study: 6 patients with GPi‐DBS and 8 without DBS (control group). All 14 patients had cervical dystonia. Using H215O PET, regional cerebral blood flow was measured at rest and during a motor task performed with a nondystonic hand.ResultsIn patients with GPi‐DBS (stimulation ON and OFF), activity at rest was reduced in a prefrontal network, and during the motor task, sensorimotor cortex activity was lower than in patients without DBS. Within‐group contrasts (tapping > rest) showed less extensive task‐induced motor network activation in GPi‐DBS patients than in non‐DBS controls. Reduced sensorimotor activation amounted to a significant group‐by‐task interaction only in the stimulation ON state.ConclusionsThese findings support previous observations in generalized dystonia that suggested that GPi‐DBS normalizes dystonia‐associated sensorimotor and prefrontal hyperactivity, indicating similar mechanisms in generalized and focal or segmental dystonia. Evidence is provided that these effects extend into the OFF state, which was not previously demonstrated by neuroimaging. © 2020 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
536 _ _ |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|c POF3-572
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Pauls, K. Amande M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Koy, Anne
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Südmeyer, Martin
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Schnitzler, Alfons
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Timmermann, Lars
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Fink, Gereon R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
|b 6
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Eggers, Carsten
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1002/mds.27970
|g p. mds.27970
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2041249-6
|n 4
|p 629-639
|t Movement disorders
|v 35
|y 2020
|x 1531-8257
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/872731/files/Greuel_2020_Mov%20Disord_Pallidal%20Deep%20Brain%20Stimulation.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/872731/files/Greuel_2020_Mov%20Disord_Pallidal%20Deep%20Brain%20Stimulation.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:872731
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v (Dys-)function and Plasticity
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b MOVEMENT DISORD : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b MOVEMENT DISORD : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21