% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Mahlein:873143,
author = {Mahlein, Anne-Katrin and Kuska, Matheus Thomas and Thomas,
Stefan and Wahabzada, Mirwaes and Behmann, Jan and Rascher,
Uwe and Kersting, Kristian},
title = {{Q}uantitative and qualitative phenotyping of disease
resistance of crops by hyperspectral sensors: seamless
interlocking of phytopathology, sensors, and machine
learning is needed!},
journal = {Current opinion in plant biology},
volume = {50},
issn = {1369-5266},
address = {London},
publisher = {Current Biology Ltd.},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-00588},
pages = {156 - 162},
year = {2019},
abstract = {Determination and characterization of resistance reactions
of crops against fungal pathogens are essential to select
resistant genotypes. In plant breeding, phenotyping of
genotypes is realized by time consuming and expensive visual
plant ratings. During resistance reactions and during
pathogenesis plants initiate different structural and
biochemical defence mechanisms, which partly affect the
optical properties of plant organs. Recently, intensive
research has been conducted to develop innovative optical
methods for an assessment of compatible and incompatible
plant pathogen interaction. These approaches, combining
classical phytopathology or microbiology with technology
driven methods — such as sensors, robotics, machine
learning, and artificial intelligence — are summarized by
the term digital phenotyping. In contrast to common visual
rating, detection and assessment methods, optical sensors in
combination with advanced data analysis methods are able to
retrieve pathogen induced changes in the physiology of
susceptible or resistant plants non-invasively and
objectively. Phenotyping disease resistance aims different
tasks. In an early breeding step, a qualitative assessment
and characterization of specific resistance action is aimed
to link it, for example, to a genetic marker. Later, during
greenhouse and field screening, the assessment of the level
of susceptibility of different genotypes is relevant. Within
this review, recent advances of digital phenotyping
technologies for the detection of subtle resistance
reactions and resistance breeding are highlighted and
methodological requirements are critically discussed},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {580},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:31387067},
UT = {WOS:000486357700019},
doi = {10.1016/j.pbi.2019.06.007},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/873143},
}