000873311 001__ 873311
000873311 005__ 20210130004414.0
000873311 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5194/hess-2019-543
000873311 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/24097
000873311 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:69047893
000873311 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-00629
000873311 082__ $$a550
000873311 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aCouvreur, Valentin$$b0
000873311 245__ $$aDisentangling temporal and population variability in plant root water uptake from stable isotopic analysis: a labeling study
000873311 260__ $$aKatlenburg-Lindau$$bSoc.$$c2019
000873311 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000873311 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000873311 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1580307798_20520
000873311 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000873311 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000873311 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000873311 520__ $$a<p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Isotopic labeling techniques have the potential to minimize the uncertainty of plant root water uptake (RWU) profiles estimated through multi-source (statistical) modeling, by artificially enhancing soil water isotopic gradient. Furthermore, physical models can account for hydrodynamic constraints to RWU if simultaneous soil and plant water status data is available.</p> <p>In this study, a population of tall fescue (<i>Festuca arundinacae</i> cv Soni) was grown in a macro-rhizotron setup under semi-controlled conditions to monitor such variables for a 34-hours long period following the oxygen stable isotopic (<sup>18</sup>O) labeling of deep soil water. Aboveground variables included tiller and leaf water oxygen isotopic compositions as well as leaf water potential (<i>&#968;</i><sub>leaf</sub>), relative humidity, and transpiration rate. Belowground profiles of root length density (RLD), soil water content and isotopic composition were also sampled. While there were strong correlations between hydraulic variables as well as between isotopic variables, the experimental results underlined the discrepancy between variations of hydraulic and isotopic variables.</p> <p>In order to dissect the problem, we reproduced both types of observations with a one-dimensional physical model of water flow in the soil-plant domain, for 60 different realistic RLD profiles. While simulated <i>&#968;</i><sub>leaf</sub> followed clear temporal variations with little differences across plants as if they were &#8220;on board of the same rollercoaster&#8221;, simulated <i>&#948;</i><sub>tiller</sub> values within the plant population were rather heterogeneous (&#8220;swarm-like&#8221;) with relatively little temporal variation and a strong sensitivity to rooting depth. The physical model thus suggested that the discrepancy between isotopic and hydraulic observations was logical, as the variability captured by the former was spatial and may not correlate with the temporal dynamics of the latter.</p> <p>For comparison purposes a Bayesian statistical model was also used to simulate RWU. While they predicted relatively similar cumulative RWU profiles, the physical model could differentiate spatial from temporal dynamics of the isotopic signature, and supported that the local increase of soil water content and formation of a peak of labelled water observed overnight were due to hydraulic lift.</p>
000873311 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000873311 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000873311 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145658$$aRothfuss, Youri$$b1$$eCorresponding author
000873311 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMeunier, Félicien$$b2
000873311 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBariac, Thierry$$b3
000873311 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBiron, Philippe$$b4
000873311 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDurand, Jean-Louis$$b5
000873311 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRichard, Patricia$$b6
000873311 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129477$$aJavaux, Mathieu$$b7$$ufzj
000873311 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2190493-5$$a10.5194/hess-2019-543$$p543$$tHydrology and earth system sciences discussions$$v $$x1812-2108$$y2019
000873311 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/873311/files/hess-2019-543.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000873311 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/873311/files/hess-2019-543.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000873311 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:873311$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000873311 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145658$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000873311 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129477$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b7$$kFZJ
000873311 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000873311 9141_ $$y2019
000873311 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000873311 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000873311 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000873311 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000873311 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000873311 980__ $$ajournal
000873311 980__ $$aVDB
000873311 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000873311 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000873311 9801_ $$aFullTexts