% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{PalomeroGallagher:873406,
author = {Palomero-Gallagher, Nicola and Kedo, Olga and Mohlberg,
Hartmut and Zilles, Karl and Amunts, Katrin},
title = {{M}ultimodal mapping and analysis of the cyto- and
receptorarchitecture of the human hippocampus},
journal = {Brain structure $\&$ function},
volume = {225},
issn = {1863-2661},
address = {Heidelberg},
publisher = {Springer},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-00716},
pages = {881–907},
year = {2020},
abstract = {The human hippocampal formation is relevant for various
aspects of memory and learning, and the different
hippocampal regions are differentially affected by
neuropsychiatric disorders. Therefore, the hippocampal
formation has been subject of numerous cytoarchitectonic and
other mapping studies, which resulted in divergent
parcellation schemes. To understand the principles of
hippocampal architecture, it is necessary to integrate
different levels of hippocampal organisation, going beyond
one modality. We here applied a multimodal mapping approach
combining cyto- and multi-receptorarchitectonic analyses,
and generated probabilistic maps in stereotaxic space of the
identified regions. Cytoarchitecture in combination with the
regional and laminar distribution of 15 neurotransmitter
receptors visualized by in vitro receptor autoradiography
were analysed in seven hemispheres from 6 unfixed shock
frozen and serially sectioned brains. Cytoarchitectonic
delineations for generation of probabilistic maps were
carried out on histological sections from ten fixed,
paraffin embedded and serially sectioned brains. Nine cyto-
and receptorarchitectonically distinct regions were
identified within the hippocampal formation (i.e., fascia
dentata, cornu Ammonis (CA) regions 1–4, prosubiculum,
subiculum proper, presubiculum and parasubiculum), as well
as the hippocampal-amygdaloid transition area and the
periallocortical transsubiculum. Subsequently generated
probabilistic maps quantify intersubject variability in the
size and extent of these cyto- and receptorarchitectonically
distinct regions. The regions did not differ in their volume
between the hemispheres and gender. Receptor mapping
revealed additional subdivisions which could not be detected
by cytoarchitectonic analysis alone. They correspond to
parcellations previously found in immunohistochemical and
connectivity studies. The multimodal approach enabled the
definition of regions not consistently reported, e.g., CA4
region or prosubiculum. The ensuing detailed probabilistic
maps of the hippocampal formation constitute the basis for
future architectonically informed analyses of in vivo
neuroimaging studies.},
cin = {INM-1},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406},
pnm = {571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF3-571) / HBP SGA2 -
Human Brain Project Specific Grant Agreement 2 (785907)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571 / G:(EU-Grant)785907},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:31955294},
UT = {WOS:000517230500001},
doi = {10.1007/s00429-019-02022-4},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/873406},
}