% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Kin:873555,
      author       = {Kin, Li-chung and Liu, Zhifa and Astakhov, Oleksandr and
                      Agbo, Solomon N. and Tempel, Hermann and Yu, Shicheng and
                      Kungl, Hans and Eichel, Rüdiger-A. and Rau, Uwe and
                      Kirchartz, Thomas and Merdzhanova, Tsvetelina},
      title        = {{E}fficient {A}rea {M}atched {C}onverter {A}ided {S}olar
                      {C}harging of {L}ithium {I}on {B}atteries {U}sing {H}igh
                      {V}oltage {P}erovskite {S}olar {C}ells},
      journal      = {ACS applied energy materials},
      volume       = {3},
      number       = {1},
      issn         = {2574-0962},
      address      = {Washington, DC},
      publisher    = {ACS Publications},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-00823},
      pages        = {431 - 439},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Efficient solar charging of a battery has been demonstrated
                      in the past by sizing batteries many times that of a solar
                      cell to reduce the effective current density experienced by
                      the battery. Although efficient, such a strategy of coupling
                      a battery up to 10 times larger with a solar cell will make
                      solar–battery integration more challenging and limit the
                      size, and thus maximum power output, of an integrated
                      device. Area matched LFP-LTO (lithium iron phosphate,
                      lithium titanate) battery solar charging using high voltage
                      lead halide perovskite solar cells with a boost converter
                      gave a maximum overall efficiency of $9.9\%$ and a high
                      $14.9\%$ solar to battery charging efficiency. Two
                      differently sized systems were compared using the same
                      converter, and an exergy analysis was performed, showing
                      limitations of converter usage in solar-powered internet of
                      things (IoT) devices and size dependent battery losses.},
      cin          = {IEK-5 / IEK-9},
      ddc          = {540},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-5-20101013 / I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-9-20110218},
      pnm          = {121 - Solar cells of the next generation (POF3-121) / 131 -
                      Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-121 / G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000510104700050},
      doi          = {10.1021/acsaem.9b01672},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/873555},
}