% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Peyre:873603,
      author       = {Peyre, Hugo and Mohanpuria, Neha and Jednoróg, Katarzyna
                      and Heim, Stefan and Grande, Marion and van
                      Ermingen-Marbach, Muna and Altarelli, Irene and Monzalvo,
                      Karla and Williams, Camille and Germanaud, David and Toro,
                      Roberto and Ramus, Franck},
      title        = {{N}euroanatomy of dyslexia: {A}n allometric approach},
      journal      = {European journal of neuroscience},
      volume       = {52},
      number       = {6},
      issn         = {1460-9568},
      address      = {Oxford [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Blackwell},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-00846},
      pages        = {3595-3609},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Despite evidence for a difference in total brain volume
                      between dyslexic and good readers, no previous neuroimaging
                      study examined differences in allometric scaling (i.e.
                      differences in the relationship between regional and total
                      brain volumes) between dyslexic and good readers. The
                      present study aims to fill this gap by testing differences
                      in allometric scaling and lobar brain volume differences in
                      dyslexic and good readers. Object-based morphometry analysis
                      was used to determine grey and white matter volumes of the 4
                      lobes, the cerebellum, and limbic structures in 130 dyslexic
                      and 106 good readers aged 8 to 14 years. Data were collected
                      across three countries (France, Poland, and Germany). Three
                      methodological approaches were used: Principal Components
                      Analysis (PCA), linear regression, and Multiple Group
                      Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA). Difference in total
                      brain volume between good and dyslexic readers was Cohen's
                      d=0.39. We found no difference in allometric scaling, nor in
                      regional brain volume between dyslexic and good readers.
                      Results of our three methodological approaches (PCA, linear
                      regression and MGCFA) were consistent. This study provides
                      evidence for total brain volume differences between dyslexic
                      and control children, but no evidence for differences in the
                      volumes of the four lobes, the cerebellum or limbic
                      structures, once allometry is properly taken into account.
                      It also finds no evidence for a difference in allometric
                      relationships between the groups. We highlight the
                      methodological interest of the MGCFA approach to investigate
                      such research issues.},
      cin          = {INM-1},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406},
      pnm          = {571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF3-571)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:31991019},
      UT           = {WOS:000513510900001},
      doi          = {10.1111/ejn.14690},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/873603},
}