001     873603
005     20210130004456.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1111/ejn.14690
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a pmid:31991019
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a 0953-816X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1460-9568
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/25869
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:74748429
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000513510900001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-00846
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Peyre, Hugo
|0 0000-0001-8757-0783
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Neuroanatomy of dyslexia: An allometric approach
260 _ _ |a Oxford [u.a.]
|c 2020
|b Blackwell
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1602588661_2978
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Despite evidence for a difference in total brain volume between dyslexic and good readers, no previous neuroimaging study examined differences in allometric scaling (i.e. differences in the relationship between regional and total brain volumes) between dyslexic and good readers. The present study aims to fill this gap by testing differences in allometric scaling and lobar brain volume differences in dyslexic and good readers. Object-based morphometry analysis was used to determine grey and white matter volumes of the 4 lobes, the cerebellum, and limbic structures in 130 dyslexic and 106 good readers aged 8 to 14 years. Data were collected across three countries (France, Poland, and Germany). Three methodological approaches were used: Principal Components Analysis (PCA), linear regression, and Multiple Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MGCFA). Difference in total brain volume between good and dyslexic readers was Cohen's d=0.39. We found no difference in allometric scaling, nor in regional brain volume between dyslexic and good readers. Results of our three methodological approaches (PCA, linear regression and MGCFA) were consistent. This study provides evidence for total brain volume differences between dyslexic and control children, but no evidence for differences in the volumes of the four lobes, the cerebellum or limbic structures, once allometry is properly taken into account. It also finds no evidence for a difference in allometric relationships between the groups. We highlight the methodological interest of the MGCFA approach to investigate such research issues.
536 _ _ |a 571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF3-571)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571
|c POF3-571
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, PubMed,
700 1 _ |a Mohanpuria, Neha
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Jednoróg, Katarzyna
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Heim, Stefan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131644
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Grande, Marion
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a van Ermingen-Marbach, Muna
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)156512
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Altarelli, Irene
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Monzalvo, Karla
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Williams, Camille
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Germanaud, David
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Toro, Roberto
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Ramus, Franck
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
773 _ _ |a 10.1111/ejn.14690
|g p. ejn.14690
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2005178-5
|n 6
|p 3595-3609
|t European journal of neuroscience
|v 52
|y 2020
|x 1460-9568
856 4 _ |y Published on 2020-01-28. Available in OpenAccess from 2021-01-28.
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/873603/files/MAINEJN.v11.clean.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/873603/files/ejn.14690.pdf
856 4 _ |y Published on 2020-01-28. Available in OpenAccess from 2021-01-28.
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/873603/files/MAINEJN.v11.clean.pdf?subformat=pdfa
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/873603/files/ejn.14690.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:873603
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131644
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Connectivity and Activity
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b EUR J NEUROSCI : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406
|k INM-1
|l Strukturelle und funktionelle Organisation des Gehirns
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21