% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Grimm:874044,
      author       = {Grimm, Fabian and Neubert, Michael and Karl, Jürgen and
                      Menzler, Norbert H. and Guillon, Olivier},
      title        = {{S}election of cathode materials for forsterite-supported
                      solid oxide fuel cells – {P}art {II}: {E}lectro-catalytic
                      activity},
      journal      = {Journal of power sources},
      volume       = {451},
      issn         = {0378-7753},
      address      = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-01199},
      pages        = {227811 -},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Based on the interactions and the formation of secondary
                      phases of various SOFC cathode materials if they are
                      processed with the restrictions of an inert-supported cell
                      utilizing forsterite as support material (described in Part
                      I), impedance measurements and cell tests were performed to
                      clarify the impact of the described interactions on the
                      material combinations electrocatalytic
                      performance.Subsequently Part II focusses on the
                      preselection of a cathode material displaying a higher
                      catalytic activity compared to the currently used LSM/8YSZ
                      cathode of the inert-supported cell concept. In order to do
                      so symmetrical cells, mimicking the processing, were
                      fabricated by co-firing various cathodes
                      (La0.58Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3; Pr0.58Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3;
                      La0.58Sr0.4CoO3; La0.58Sr0.4FeO3; La0.58Ca0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3;
                      (La0.8Sr0.2)0.95Fe0.2Mn0.8O3; (La0.9Sr0.1)0.95Fe0.7Mn0.3O3)
                      together with an La0.65Sr0.3MnO3 current collector layer
                      (CCL) or with one LSM CCL containing 20 $wt\%$ of
                      forsterite.The results indicate that the catalytic activity
                      of the cathodes cannot simply be related to the number or
                      amount of secondary phases formed during the co-firing if
                      forsterite is present or not as LSF, which displayed the
                      formation of numerous secondary phases (Part I), exhibits
                      the best catalytic activity. The following ascending order
                      of catalytic activity was obtained: LSF (0.25 Ωcm2) >
                      LSM/8YSZ > PSCF > LSFM > LSCF > LCCF > LSC (77.43 Ωcm2).},
      cin          = {IEK-1},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-1-20101013},
      pnm          = {135 - Fuel Cells (POF3-135) / SOFC - Solid Oxide Fuel Cell
                      (SOFC-20140602)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135 / G:(DE-Juel1)SOFC-20140602},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000518874300066},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227811},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874044},
}