% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Oyiga:874228,
      author       = {Oyiga, Benedict C. and Palczak, Janina and Wojciechowski,
                      Tobias and Lynch, Jonathan P. and Naz, Ali A and Léon, Jens
                      and Ballvora, Agim},
      title        = {{G}enetic components of root architecture and anatomy
                      adjustments to water‐deficit stress in spring barley},
      journal      = {Plant, cell $\&$ environment},
      volume       = {43},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {1365-3040},
      address      = {Oxford [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Wiley-Blackwell},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-01320},
      pages        = {692 - 711},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Roots perform vital roles for adaptation and productivity
                      under water‐deficit stress, even though their specific
                      functions are poorly understood. In this study, the genetic
                      control of the nodal‐root architectural and anatomical
                      response to water deficit were investigated among diverse
                      spring barley accessions. Water deficit induced substantial
                      variations in the nodal root traits. The cortical, stele,
                      and total root cross‐sectional areas of the main‐shoot
                      nodal roots decreased under water deficit, but increased in
                      the tiller nodal roots. Root xylem density and arrested
                      nodal roots increased under water deficit, with the
                      formation of root suberization/lignification and large
                      cortical aerenchyma. Genome‐wide association study
                      implicated 11 QTL intervals in the architectural and
                      anatomical nodal root response to water deficit. Among them,
                      three and four QTL intervals had strong effects across
                      seasons and on both root architectural and anatomical
                      traits, respectively. Genome‐wide epistasis analysis
                      revealed 44 epistatically interacting SNP loci. Further
                      analyses showed that these QTL intervals contain important
                      candidate genes, including ZIFL2, MATE, and PPIB, whose
                      functions are shown to be related to the root adaptive
                      response to water deprivation in plants. These results give
                      novel insight into the genetic architectures of barley nodal
                      root response to soil water deficit stress in the fields,
                      and thus offer useful resources for root‐targeted
                      marker‐assisted selection.},
      cin          = {IBG-2},
      ddc          = {580},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
      pnm          = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:31734943},
      UT           = {WOS:000504815500001},
      doi          = {10.1111/pce.13683},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874228},
}