% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Harboe:874483,
      author       = {Harboe, S. and Schreiber, A. and Margaritis, N. and Blum,
                      L. and Guillon, O. and Menzler, Norbert H.},
      title        = {{M}anufacturing cost model for planar 5 k{W}el {SOFC}
                      stacks at {F}orschungszentrum {J}ülich},
      journal      = {International journal of hydrogen energy},
      volume       = {45},
      number       = {15},
      issn         = {0360-3199},
      address      = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-01462},
      pages        = {8015 - 8030},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {A study is performed on the manufacturing costs of planar
                      Jülich Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) stacks, based on
                      anode-supported cells (ASC). The manufacturing of two ASC
                      concepts with different design approaches (referred to as
                      standard and light-weight) are evaluated on the basis of
                      stacks that have undergone performance and degradation
                      testing. A bottom-up cost model for 5 kWel is constructed to
                      estimate the costs at production volumes of 1 MWel, 10 MWel
                      and 25 MWel per annum. The direct costs of manufacturing are
                      estimated as 2737–1210 €kWel−1 for the standard
                      design, and 2170–580 €kWel−1 for the light-weight
                      design, depending on production volume. For the evaluated
                      concepts, the material costs are estimated to be dominant
                      over the other factors (at the 25 MWel per annum scale >
                      $65\%)$ which is in accordance with most previous studies.
                      The effect of the different design types on the costs is
                      discussed. The steel components are found to be the most
                      cost-intensive, benefiting the light-weight design. Cost
                      sensitivity analyses to manufacturing parameters, power
                      density and degradation are performed, as well as a
                      theoretical scenarios calculated based on low-cost steel
                      type SS441 replacing the costly Crofer materials and
                      co-sintering replacing sequential sintering. The results are
                      compared to previous studies. Strategies for cost-saving are
                      discussed based on 20 years of experience with stack
                      building and testing in Jülich.},
      cin          = {IEK-1 / IEK-STE / ZEA-1 / IEK-14},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-1-20101013 / I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013 /
                      I:(DE-Juel1)ZEA-1-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-14-20191129},
      pnm          = {135 - Fuel Cells (POF3-135) / SOFC - Solid Oxide Fuel Cell
                      (SOFC-20140602)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135 / G:(DE-Juel1)SOFC-20140602},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000523643400003},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.01.082},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874483},
}