001     874488
005     20220930130232.0
024 7 _ |a 10.3390/rs12060925
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/24575
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000526820600027
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:78016973
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-01467
041 _ _ |a English
082 _ _ |a 620
100 1 _ |a Tewes, Andreas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)180165
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a How Do Methods Assimilating Sentinel-2-Derived LAI Combined with Two Different Sources of Soil Input Data Affect the Crop Model-Based Estimation of Wheat Biomass at Sub-Field Level?
260 _ _ |a Basel
|c 2020
|b MDPI
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1584458414_22061
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
500 _ _ |a Grant Agrarsysteme der Zukunft: DAKIS —Digitales Wissens- und Informationssystem für die Landwirtschaft, Teilprojekt FFörderkennzeichen: 031B0729F
520 _ _ |a The combination of Sentinel-2 derived information about sub-field heterogeneity of crop canopy leaf area index (LAI) and SoilGrids-derived information about local soil properties might help to improve the prediction accuracy of crop simulation models at sub-field level without prior knowledge of detailed site characteristics. In this study, we ran a crop model using either soil texture derived from samples that were taken spatially distributed across a field and analyzed in the lab (AS) or SoilGrids-derived soil texture (SG) as model input in combination with different levels of LAI assimilation. We relied on the LINTUL5 model implemented in the SIMPLACE modeling framework to simulate winter wheat biomass development in 40 to 60 points in each field with detailed measured soil information available, for 14 fields across France, Germany, and the Netherlands during two growing seasons. Water stress was the only growth-limiting factor considered in the model. The model performance was evaluated against total aboveground biomass measurements at harvest with regard to the average per-field prediction and the simulated spatial variability within the field. Our findings showed that a) per-field average biomass predictions of SG-based modeling approaches were not inferior to those using AS-texture as input, but came with a greater prediction uncertainty, b) relying on the generation of an ensemble without LAI assimilation might produce results as accurate as simulations where LAI is assimilated, and c) sub-field heterogeneity was not reproduced well in any of the fields, predominantly because of an inaccurate simulation of water stress in the model. We conclude that research should be devoted to the testing of different approaches to simulate soil moisture dynamics and to the testing in other sites, potentially using LAI products derived from other remotely sensed imagery.
536 _ _ |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|c POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Hoffmann, Holger
|0 0000-0001-9811-5065
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Nolte, Manuel
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Krauss, Gunther
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Schäfer, Fabian
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Kerkhoff, Christian
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Gaiser, Thomas
|0 0000-0002-5820-2364
|b 6
773 _ _ |a 10.3390/rs12060925
|g Vol. 12, no. 6, p. 925 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2513863-7
|n 6
|p 925 -
|t Remote sensing
|v 12
|y 2020
|x 2072-4292
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874488/files/Invoice_remotesensing-730260.pdf
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874488/files/Invoice_remotesensing-730260.pdf?subformat=pdfa
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874488/files/remotesensing-12-00925.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874488/files/remotesensing-12-00925.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:874488
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)180165
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b REMOTE SENS-BASEL : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21