% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@INBOOK{Heinrichs:874509,
      author       = {Heinrichs, Jan-Hendrik},
      title        = {{A}rtificial {I}ntelligence in {E}xtended {M}inds:
                      {I}ntrapersonal {D}iffusion of {R}esponsibility and {L}egal
                      {M}ultiple {P}ersonality},
      address      = {Stuttgart},
      publisher    = {J.B. Metzler},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-01483},
      pages        = {159-176},
      year         = {2020},
      comment      = {B. Beck, M. Kühler (Hg.), Technology, Anthropology, and
                      Dimensions of Responsibility},
      booktitle     = {B. Beck, M. Kühler (Hg.), Technology,
                       Anthropology, and Dimensions of
                       Responsibility},
      abstract     = {Can an artificially intelligent tool be a part of a
                      human’s extended mind? There are two opposing streams of
                      thought in this regard. One of them can be identified as the
                      externalist perspective in the philosophy of mind, which
                      tries to explain complex states and processes of an
                      individual as co-constituted by elements of the
                      individual’s material and social environment. The other
                      strand is normative and explanatory atomism which insists
                      that what is to be explained and evaluated is the behaviour
                      of individuals. In the present contribution, it is argued
                      that counterintuitive results turn up once atomism tries to
                      appropriate insights from psychological externalism and
                      holism. These results are made visible by technological
                      innovations, especially artificially intelligent systems,
                      but they do not result from these innovations alone. They
                      are rather implicit in situated cognition approaches which
                      join both theoretical strands. This has repercussions for
                      explanatory as well as ethical theorising based on situated
                      cognition approaches. It is a fairly rare constellation that
                      new technological options, namely artificial intelligence,
                      raise doubts concerning a philosophical theory, namely
                      extended mind theory.},
      cin          = {INM-8},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406},
      pnm          = {574 - Theory, modelling and simulation (POF3-574)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)7},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874509},
}