000874608 001__ 874608
000874608 005__ 20220930130233.0
000874608 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00582
000874608 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/24690
000874608 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:32308637
000874608 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000528745200001
000874608 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:80577489
000874608 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-01536
000874608 082__ $$a150
000874608 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131644$$aHeim, Stefan$$b0$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000874608 245__ $$aSo many are "few", but so few are also "few" – Reduced semantic flexibility in bvFTD patients
000874608 260__ $$aLausanne$$bFrontiers Research Foundation$$c2020
000874608 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000874608 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000874608 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1587725578_23510
000874608 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000874608 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000874608 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000874608 520__ $$aThe processing of quantifier words such as “many” or “few” is a complex operation supported by a plastic fronto-parietal network predominantly in the left hemisphere. The internal reference criterion defining a quantifier (e.g., ≥50% for “many”) can be modified in a learning paradigm. Most interestingly, changing the criterion for one quantifier also leads to a change in the criterion for the untrained quantifier, i.e., a semantic restructuring effect, which is supported by Broca’s region in the left inferior frontal cortex. Here, we applied this paradigm to patients with the behavioral variant of fronto-temporal dementia (bvFTD) because they suffer from loss of cognitive flexibility, reduced ability to process quantities and their values, impaired reinforcement learning, and language comprehension deficits. The question was whether the patients would be able to perform the task, show direct learning of the new quantifier meanings, and exhibit cognitive flexibility in terms of semantic restructuring. Eleven bvFTD patients took part in two behavioral experiments. In Experiment 1, in a first baseline block, each individual’s criterion for “many” and “few” was assessed. In block 2, subjects received feedback about their decisions. Contrary to their initial notion, a proportion of 40% yellow circles was reinforced as “many.” In block 3, the effect of this training on their judgments of “many” and “few” was re-assessed. The group of bvFTD patients showed a learning effect for the new criterion trained for the quantifier “many,” but failed to generalize this criterion shift to the other quantifier “few.” Experiment 2 was similar to Experiment 1, but the patients were trained in Block 2 to judge 60% of circles as “few,” with no training for “many.” Again, there was an average learning effect for the trained quantifier “few” over the entire group, but no generalization to “many.” Since the patients were still able to perform the task and showed learning of “many” to direct feedback, the data suggest that the generalization process, rather than initial learning, is more vulnerable to fronto-temporal degeneration.
000874608 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571$$a571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF3-571)$$cPOF3-571$$fPOF III$$x0
000874608 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000874608 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMcMillan, C. T.$$b1
000874608 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aOlm, C$$b2
000874608 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGrossmann, M.$$b3
000874608 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2563826-9$$a10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00582$$gVol. 11, p. 582$$p582$$tFrontiers in psychology$$v11$$x1664-1078$$y2020
000874608 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874608/files/2019-0221349-4.pdf
000874608 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874608/files/2019-0221349-4.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000874608 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874608/files/Heim_Fronz%20in%20Psychol_2020.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000874608 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874608/files/Heim_Fronz%20in%20Psychol_2020.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000874608 8767_ $$82019-0221349-4$$92020-03-11$$d2020-04-24$$eAPC$$jDeposit$$lDeposit: Frontiers$$p508844$$zUSD 2507.50
000874608 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:874608$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire$$pdnbdelivery
000874608 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131644$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b0$$kFZJ
000874608 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$vConnectivity and Activity$$x0
000874608 9141_ $$y2020
000874608 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000874608 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index
000874608 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000874608 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bFRONT PSYCHOL : 2017
000874608 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences
000874608 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000874608 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000874608 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000874608 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000874608 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review
000874608 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000874608 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000874608 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central
000874608 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000874608 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406$$kINM-1$$lStrukturelle und funktionelle Organisation des Gehirns$$x0
000874608 980__ $$ajournal
000874608 980__ $$aVDB
000874608 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406
000874608 980__ $$aAPC
000874608 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000874608 9801_ $$aAPC
000874608 9801_ $$aFullTexts