% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{WeimerJehle:874651,
      author       = {Weimer-Jehle, Wolfgang and Vögele, Stefan and Hauser,
                      Wolfgang and Kosow, Hannah and Poganietz, Witold-Roger and
                      Prehofer, Sigrid},
      title        = {{S}ocio-technical energy scenarios: {S}tate-of-the-art and
                      {CIB}-based approaches},
      journal      = {Climatic change},
      volume       = {162},
      issn         = {1573-1480},
      address      = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-01569},
      pages        = {1723–1741},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Energy conversion is a major source of greenhouse gas (GHG)
                      emissions, and energy transition scenarios are a key tool
                      for gaining a greater understanding of the possible pathways
                      toward climate protection. There is consensus in energy
                      research that political and societal framework conditions
                      will play a pivotal role in shaping energy transitions. In
                      energy scenario construction, this perspective is
                      increasingly acknowledged through the approach of informing
                      model-based energy analysis with storylines about societal
                      futures, an exercise we call “socio-technical energy
                      scenario construction” in this article. However, there is
                      a dispute about how to construct the storylines in a
                      traceable, consistent, comprehensive, and reproducible way.
                      This study aims to support energy researchers considering
                      the use of the concept of socio-technical scenarios in two
                      ways: first, we provide a state-of-the-art analysis of
                      socio-technical energy scenario construction by comparing 16
                      studies with respect to five categories. Second, we address
                      the dispute regarding storyline construction in energy
                      research and examine 13 reports using the Cross-Impact
                      Balances method. We collated researcher statements on the
                      strengths and challenges of this method and identified seven
                      categories of promises and challenges each},
      cin          = {IEK-STE},
      ddc          = {550},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-STE-20101013},
      pnm          = {153 - Assessment of Energy Systems – Addressing Issues of
                      Energy Efficiency and Energy Security (POF3-153)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-153},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000517689500002},
      doi          = {10.1007/s10584-020-02680-y},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874651},
}