001     874655
005     20210130004735.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.brs.2020.01.016
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1876-4754
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1935-861X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/24588
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:78545025
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:32289686
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000533522600019
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-01571
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Tscherpel, Caroline
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)168559
|b 0
245 _ _ |a The differential roles of contralesional frontoparietal areas in cortical reorganization after stroke
260 _ _ |a New York, NY [u.a.]
|c 2020
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1585039864_3401
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a BackgroundStudies examining the contribution of contralesional brain regions to motor recovery after stroke have revealed conflicting results comprising both supporting and disturbing influences. Especially the relevance of contralesional brain regions beyond primary motor cortex (M1) has rarely been studied, particularly concerning the temporal dynamics post-stroke.MethodsWe, therefore, used online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) interference to longitudinally assess the role of contralesional (right) frontoparietal areas for recovery of hand motor function after left hemispheric stroke: contralesional M1, contralesional dorsal premotor cortex (dPMC), and contralesional anterior intraparietal sulcus (IPS). Fourteen stroke patients and sixteen age-matched healthy subjects performed motor tasks of varying complexity with their (paretic) right hand. Motor performance was quantified using three-dimensional kinematic data. All patients were assessed twice, (i) in the first week, and (ii) after more than three months post-stroke.ResultsWhile we did not observe a significant effect of TMS interference on movement kinematics following the stimulation of contralesional M1 and dPMC in the first week post-stroke, we found improvements of motor performance upon interference with contralesional IPS across motor tasks early after stroke, an effect that persisted into the later phase. By contrast, for dPMC, TMS-induced deterioration of motor performance was only evident three months post-stroke, suggesting that a supportive role of contralesional premotor cortex might evolve with reorganization.ConclusionWe here highlight time-sensitive and region-specific effects of contralesional frontoparietal areas after left hemisphere stroke, which may influence on neuromodulation regimes aiming at supporting recovery of motor function post-stroke.
536 _ _ |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|c POF3-572
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Hensel, Lukas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)142144
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Lemberg, Katharina
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Vollmer, Mattias
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Volz, Lukas J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Fink, Gereon R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
|b 5
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Grefkes, Christian
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)161406
|b 6
|e Corresponding author
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.brs.2020.01.016
|g Vol. 13, no. 3, p. 614 - 624
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2404774-0
|n 3
|p 614 - 624
|t Brain stimulation
|v 13
|y 2020
|x 1935-861X
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874655/files/Tscherpel_2020_Brain%20Stim_The%20differential%20roles%20of%20contralesional%20frontoparietal%20areas%20in%20cortical%20reorganization%20after%20stroke.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874655/files/Tscherpel_2020_Brain%20Stim_The%20differential%20roles%20of%20contralesional%20frontoparietal%20areas%20in%20cortical%20reorganization%20after%20stroke.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:874655
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)161406
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v (Dys-)function and Plasticity
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNCND4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b BRAIN STIMUL : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b BRAIN STIMUL : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21