001     874902
005     20210130004821.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1002/jmri.27136
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1053-1807
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1522-2586
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/25765
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a pmid:32246803
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000523255700001
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-01690
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Lennartz, Simon
|0 0000-0002-3254-4809
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a MRI Follow-up of Astrocytoma: Automated Coregistration and Color-Coding of FLAIR Sequences Improves Diagnostic Accuracy With Comparable Reading Time
260 _ _ |a New York, NY
|c 2020
|b Wiley-Liss
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1601041759_15197
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a BackgroundMRI follow‐up is widely used for longitudinal assessment of astrocytoma, yet reading can be tedious and error‐prone, in particular when changes are subtle.Purpose/HypothesisTo determine the effect of automated, color‐coded coregistration (AC) of fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences on diagnostic accuracy, certainty, and reading time compared to conventional follow‐up MRI assessment of astrocytoma patients.Study TypeRetrospective.PopulationIn all, 41 patients with neuropathologically confirmed astrocytoma.Field Strength/Sequence1.0–3.0T/FLAIRAssessmentThe presence or absence of tumor progression was determined based on FLAIR sequences, contrast‐enhanced T1 sequences, and clinical data. Three radiologists assessed 47 MRI study pairs in a conventional reading (CR) and in a second reading supported by AC after 6 weeks. Readers determined the presence/absence of tumor progression and indicated diagnostic certainty on a 5‐point Likert scale. Reading time was recorded by an independent assessor.Statistical TestsThe Wilcoxon test was used to assess reading time and diagnostic certainty. Differences in diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were analyzed with the McNemar mid‐p test.ResultsReaders attained significantly higher overall sensitivity (0.86 vs. 0.75; P < 0.05) and diagnostic accuracy (0.84 vs. 0.73; P < 0.05) for detection of progressive nonenhancing tumor burden when using AC compared to CR. There was a strong trend towards higher specificity within the AC‐augmented reading, yet without statistical significance (0.83 vs. 0.71; P = 0.08). Sensitivity for unequivocal disease progression was similarly high in both approaches (AC: 0.94, CR: 0.92), while for marginal disease progressions, it was significantly higher in AC (AC: 0.78, CR: 0.58; P < 0.05). Reading time including application loading time was comparable (AC: 38.1 ± 16.8 sec, CR: 36.0 ± 18.9 s; P = 0.25).Data ConclusionCompared to CR, AC improves comparison of FLAIR signal hyperintensity at MRI follow‐up of astrocytoma patients, allowing for a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy, particularly for subtle disease progression at a comparable reading time.
536 _ _ |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|c POF3-572
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Zopfs, David
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Nobis, Anne
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Paquet, Stefanie
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Hoyer, Ulrike Cornelia Isabel
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Zäske, Charlotte
|0 0000-0003-3746-8523
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Goertz, Lukas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Kabbasch, Christoph
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Laukamp, Kai Roman
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Große Hokamp, Nils
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Galldiks, Norbert
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)143792
|b 10
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Borggrefe, Jan
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
773 _ _ |a 10.1002/jmri.27136
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1497154-9
|n 4
|p 1197-1206
|t Journal of magnetic resonance imaging
|v 52
|y 2020
|x 1053-1807
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874902/files/jmri.27136.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874902/files/jmri.27136.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:874902
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 10
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)143792
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v (Dys-)function and Plasticity
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J MAGN RESON IMAGING : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21