% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Kleineberg:874913,
      author       = {Kleineberg, Nina N. and van der Meulen, Matthijs and
                      Franke, Christiana and Klingelhoefer, Lisa and Sauerbier,
                      Anna and Di Liberto, Giovanni and Carvalho, Vanessa and
                      Berendse, Henk W. and Deuschl, Günther},
      title        = {{D}ifferences in neurology residency training programmes
                      across {E}urope - a survey among {EAN}-{RRFS} national
                      representatives},
      journal      = {European journal of neurology},
      volume       = {27},
      number       = {8},
      issn         = {1351-5101},
      address      = {Oxford},
      publisher    = {Blackwell Science91133},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-01698},
      pages        = {1356-1363},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Background and purposeNeurology is rapidly evolving as a
                      result of continuous diagnostic and therapeutic progress,
                      which influences the daily work of neurologists. Therefore,
                      updating residency training programmes is crucial for the
                      future of neurology. Several countries are currently
                      discussing and/or modifying the structure of their neurology
                      residency training programme. A detailed and up‐to‐date
                      overview of the available European residency training
                      programmes will aid this process.MethodsA questionnaire
                      addressing numerous aspects of residency training programmes
                      in neurology was distributed among 38 national
                      representatives of the Resident and Research Fellow Section
                      of the European Academy of Neurology.ResultsWe obtained data
                      from 32 European countries (response rate $84\%).$ The
                      median (range) duration of the residency training programmes
                      was 60 (12–72) months. In the majority of countries,
                      rotations to other medical disciplines were mandatory,
                      mostly psychiatry $(69\%),$ internal medicine $(66\%)$ and
                      neurosurgery $(59\%).$ However, the choice of medical fields
                      and the duration of rotations varied substantially between
                      countries. In $50\%$ of countries, there were formal
                      regulations regarding training in evidence‐based medicine,
                      teaching skills and/or leadership qualities. In many
                      countries $(75\%),$ residents had to take an
                      examination.ConclusionsWe found substantial variation among
                      European countries in the duration of residency training
                      programmes, and especially in the choice of obligatory
                      rotations to external medical disciplines. Despite a
                      presumably similar spectrum of patients, neurology residency
                      training programmes across Europe are not harmonized. The
                      structure of the programme should be determined by its
                      relevance for neurologists today and in the future.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:32248603},
      UT           = {WOS:000529685200001},
      doi          = {10.1111/ene.14242},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874913},
}