001     874941
005     20220930130235.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2437-19.2020
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0270-6474
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1529-2401
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/24984
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:81032535
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:32350038
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000535695400012
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-01713
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Zeng, Hang
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)171481
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Visual size processing in early visual areas follows lateral occipital cortex involvement
260 _ _ |a Washington, DC
|c 2020
|b Soc.
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1591257405_31050
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a Neural activation in the early visual cortex (EVC) reflects the perceived rather than retinal size of stimuli, suggesting that feedback possibly from extrastriate regions modulates retinal size information in EVC. Meanwhile, the lateral occipital cortex (LOC) has been suggested to be critically involved in object size processing. To test for the potential contributions of feedback modulations on size representations in EVC, we investigated the dynamics of relevant processes using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Specifically, we briefly disrupted the neural activity of EVC and LOC at early, intermediate, and late time windows while participants performed size judgement tasks in either an illusory or neutral context. TMS over EVC and LOC allowed determining whether these two brain regions are relevant for generating phenomenological size impressions. Furthermore, the temporal order of TMS effects allowed inferences on the dynamics of information exchange between the two areas. Particularly, if feedback signals from LOC to EVC are crucial for generating altered size representations in EVC, then TMS effects over EVC should be observed simultaneously or later than the effects following LOC stimulation. The data from 20 humans (13 females) revealed that TMS over both EVC and LOC impaired illusory size perception. However, the strongest effects of TMS applied over EVC occurred later than those of LOC, supporting a functionally relevant feedback modulation from LOC to EVC for scaling size information. Our results suggest that context integration and the concomitant change of perceived size require LOC and result in modulating representations in EVC via recurrent processing.
536 _ _ |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|c POF3-572
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Fink, G. R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Weidner, R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131747
|b 2
773 _ _ |a 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2437-19.2020
|g p. JN-RM-2437-19 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1475274-8
|n 22
|p 4410-4417
|t The journal of neuroscience
|v 40
|y 2020
|x 0270-6474
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874941/files/Invoice_JNeurosci06293.pdf
856 4 _ |y Published on 2020-05-27. Available in OpenAccess from 2020-11-27.
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874941/files/4410.full.pdf
856 4 _ |x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874941/files/Invoice_JNeurosci06293.pdf?subformat=pdfa
856 4 _ |y Published on 2020-05-27. Available in OpenAccess from 2020-11-27.
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874941/files/Zeng_2020_Post%20Print_Journal%20of%20Neuroscience_Visual%20size%20processing%20in%20early%20visual%20cortex.pdf
856 4 _ |y Published on 2020-05-27. Available in OpenAccess from 2020-11-27.
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874941/files/4410.full.pdf?subformat=pdfa
856 4 _ |y Published on 2020-05-27. Available in OpenAccess from 2020-11-27.
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/874941/files/Zeng_2020_Post%20Print_Journal%20of%20Neuroscience_Visual%20size%20processing%20in%20early%20visual%20cortex.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:874941
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)171481
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131747
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v (Dys-)function and Plasticity
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a Embargoed OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0530
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J NEUROSCI : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a IF >= 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9905
|2 StatID
|b J NEUROSCI : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320
|2 StatID
|b PubMed Central
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 _ _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21