000875077 001__ 875077
000875077 005__ 20210130004841.0
000875077 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1162/jocn_a_01480
000875077 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0898-929X
000875077 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1530-8898
000875077 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/24700
000875077 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:31617822
000875077 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000504866700011
000875077 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-01787
000875077 082__ $$a610
000875077 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aEl-Sourani, Nadiya$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000875077 245__ $$aPredictive Impact of Contextual Objects during Action Observation: Evidence from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
000875077 260__ $$aCambridge, Mass.$$bMIT Pr. Journals$$c2020
000875077 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000875077 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000875077 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1587538676_16485
000875077 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000875077 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000875077 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000875077 520__ $$aThe processing of congruent stimuli, such as an object or action in its typical location, is usually associated with reduced neural activity, probably due to facilitated recognition. However, in some situations, congruency increases neural activity—for example, when objects next to observed actions are likely versus unlikely to be involved in forthcoming action steps. Here, we investigated using fMRI whether the processing of contextual cues during action perception is driven by their (in)congruency and, thus, informative value to make sense of an observed scene. Specifically, we tested whether both highly congruent contextual objects (COs), which strongly indicate a future action step, and highly incongruent COs, which require updating predictions about possible forthcoming action steps, provide more anticipatory information about the action course than moderately congruent COs. In line with our hypothesis that especially the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) subserves the integration of the additional information into the predictive model of the action, we found highly congruent and incongruent COs to increase bilateral activity in action observation nodes, that is, the IFG, the occipitotemporal cortex, and the intraparietal sulcus. Intriguingly, BA 47 was significantly stronger engaged for incongruent COs reflecting the updating of prediction in response to conflicting information. Our findings imply that the IFG reflects the informative impact of COs on observed actions by using contextual information to supply and update the currently operating predictive model. In the case of an incongruent CO, this model has to be reconsidered and extended toward a new overarching action goal.
000875077 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$a572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)$$cPOF3-572$$fPOF III$$x0
000875077 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000875077 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)169149$$aTrempler, Ima$$b1
000875077 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aWurm, Moritz F.$$b2
000875077 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aFink, Gereon R.$$b3
000875077 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchubotz, Ricarda I.$$b4
000875077 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1475255-4$$a10.1162/jocn_a_01480$$gVol. 32, no. 2, p. 326 - 337$$n2$$p326 - 337$$tJournal of cognitive neuroscience$$v32$$x1530-8898$$y2020
000875077 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875077/files/El-Sourani_2020_Post%20Print_Journal%20of%20Cognitive%20Neuroscience_Predictive%20impact%20of%20contextual%20objects%20during%20action%20observation.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000875077 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875077/files/El-Sourani_2020_Post%20Print_Journal%20of%20Cognitive%20Neuroscience_Predictive%20impact%20of%20contextual%20objects%20during%20action%20observation.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000875077 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:875077$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000875077 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)131720$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b3$$kFZJ
000875077 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$v(Dys-)function and Plasticity$$x0
000875077 9141_ $$y2020
000875077 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000875077 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index
000875077 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0600$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEbsco Academic Search
000875077 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bJ COGNITIVE NEUROSCI : 2017
000875077 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000875077 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000875077 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000875077 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000875077 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000875077 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000875077 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bASC
000875077 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000875077 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000875077 920__ $$lyes
000875077 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406$$kINM-3$$lKognitive Neurowissenschaften$$x0
000875077 980__ $$ajournal
000875077 980__ $$aVDB
000875077 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000875077 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
000875077 9801_ $$aFullTexts