% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{ElSourani:875077,
      author       = {El-Sourani, Nadiya and Trempler, Ima and Wurm, Moritz F.
                      and Fink, Gereon R. and Schubotz, Ricarda I.},
      title        = {{P}redictive {I}mpact of {C}ontextual {O}bjects during
                      {A}ction {O}bservation: {E}vidence from {F}unctional
                      {M}agnetic {R}esonance {I}maging},
      journal      = {Journal of cognitive neuroscience},
      volume       = {32},
      number       = {2},
      issn         = {1530-8898},
      address      = {Cambridge, Mass.},
      publisher    = {MIT Pr. Journals},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-01787},
      pages        = {326 - 337},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {The processing of congruent stimuli, such as an object or
                      action in its typical location, is usually associated with
                      reduced neural activity, probably due to facilitated
                      recognition. However, in some situations, congruency
                      increases neural activity—for example, when objects next
                      to observed actions are likely versus unlikely to be
                      involved in forthcoming action steps. Here, we investigated
                      using fMRI whether the processing of contextual cues during
                      action perception is driven by their (in)congruency and,
                      thus, informative value to make sense of an observed scene.
                      Specifically, we tested whether both highly congruent
                      contextual objects (COs), which strongly indicate a future
                      action step, and highly incongruent COs, which require
                      updating predictions about possible forthcoming action
                      steps, provide more anticipatory information about the
                      action course than moderately congruent COs. In line with
                      our hypothesis that especially the inferior frontal gyrus
                      (IFG) subserves the integration of the additional
                      information into the predictive model of the action, we
                      found highly congruent and incongruent COs to increase
                      bilateral activity in action observation nodes, that is, the
                      IFG, the occipitotemporal cortex, and the intraparietal
                      sulcus. Intriguingly, BA 47 was significantly stronger
                      engaged for incongruent COs reflecting the updating of
                      prediction in response to conflicting information. Our
                      findings imply that the IFG reflects the informative impact
                      of COs on observed actions by using contextual information
                      to supply and update the currently operating predictive
                      model. In the case of an incongruent CO, this model has to
                      be reconsidered and extended toward a new overarching action
                      goal.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:31617822},
      UT           = {WOS:000504866700011},
      doi          = {10.1162/jocn_a_01480},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875077},
}