001     875077
005     20210130004841.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1162/jocn_a_01480
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0898-929X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1530-8898
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/24700
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a pmid:31617822
|2 pmid
024 7 _ |a WOS:000504866700011
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-01787
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a El-Sourani, Nadiya
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Predictive Impact of Contextual Objects during Action Observation: Evidence from Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
260 _ _ |a Cambridge, Mass.
|c 2020
|b MIT Pr. Journals
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1587538676_16485
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The processing of congruent stimuli, such as an object or action in its typical location, is usually associated with reduced neural activity, probably due to facilitated recognition. However, in some situations, congruency increases neural activity—for example, when objects next to observed actions are likely versus unlikely to be involved in forthcoming action steps. Here, we investigated using fMRI whether the processing of contextual cues during action perception is driven by their (in)congruency and, thus, informative value to make sense of an observed scene. Specifically, we tested whether both highly congruent contextual objects (COs), which strongly indicate a future action step, and highly incongruent COs, which require updating predictions about possible forthcoming action steps, provide more anticipatory information about the action course than moderately congruent COs. In line with our hypothesis that especially the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) subserves the integration of the additional information into the predictive model of the action, we found highly congruent and incongruent COs to increase bilateral activity in action observation nodes, that is, the IFG, the occipitotemporal cortex, and the intraparietal sulcus. Intriguingly, BA 47 was significantly stronger engaged for incongruent COs reflecting the updating of prediction in response to conflicting information. Our findings imply that the IFG reflects the informative impact of COs on observed actions by using contextual information to supply and update the currently operating predictive model. In the case of an incongruent CO, this model has to be reconsidered and extended toward a new overarching action goal.
536 _ _ |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|c POF3-572
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Trempler, Ima
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)169149
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Wurm, Moritz F.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Fink, Gereon R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Schubotz, Ricarda I.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
773 _ _ |a 10.1162/jocn_a_01480
|g Vol. 32, no. 2, p. 326 - 337
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1475255-4
|n 2
|p 326 - 337
|t Journal of cognitive neuroscience
|v 32
|y 2020
|x 1530-8898
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875077/files/El-Sourani_2020_Post%20Print_Journal%20of%20Cognitive%20Neuroscience_Predictive%20impact%20of%20contextual%20objects%20during%20action%20observation.pdf
856 4 _ |y OpenAccess
|x pdfa
|u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875077/files/El-Sourani_2020_Post%20Print_Journal%20of%20Cognitive%20Neuroscience_Predictive%20impact%20of%20contextual%20objects%20during%20action%20observation.pdf?subformat=pdfa
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:875077
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p VDB
|p driver
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v (Dys-)function and Plasticity
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0130
|2 StatID
|b Social Sciences Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|b Ebsco Academic Search
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|b J COGNITIVE NEUROSCI : 2017
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b ASC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21