% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Latarnik:875103,
      author       = {Latarnik, S. and Wirth, K. and Held, A. and Kalbe, E. and
                      Kessler, J. and Saliger, J. and Karbe, H. and Fink, G. R.
                      and Weiss-Blankenhorn, Peter},
      title        = {{P}rävalenz und {C}harakteristika apraktischer {D}efizite
                      bei links- und rechtshemisphärischen {S}chlaganfällen},
      journal      = {Fortschritte der Neurologie, Psychiatrie},
      volume       = {88},
      number       = {04},
      issn         = {1439-3522},
      address      = {Stuttgart [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Thieme},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-01806},
      pages        = {232 - 240},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Investigations of apraxia typically focus on the role of
                      the left hemisphere (LH), although apraxic deficits can also
                      be observed after a right hemispheric (RH) stroke. We
                      directly compared the prevalence and severity of apraxic
                      deficits in patients with LH (n = 66) and RH
                      (n = 73) stroke, after controlling for the effects of
                      age and language performance. Apraxic deficits were assessed
                      using the KAS (Cologne Apraxia Screening, including
                      subscales for pantomiming and the imitation of bucco-facial
                      and hand/arm gestures) as well as the Goldenberg Hand and
                      Finger Imitation Test. Subsequently, we evaluated the effect
                      of age, language performance, and hemisphere on the
                      prevalence and characteristics of apraxic deficits by
                      regression analyses and mixed design ANOVAS. For the
                      imitation of hand positions, no significant difference was
                      found between LH and RH stroke patients, when controlling
                      for age and language performance. Consistent with the
                      literature, RH stroke patients showed a poorer performance
                      when imitating finger configurations. RH stroke patients
                      also performed worse in the bucco-facial items of the KAS,
                      particularly due to lower scores in upper-face gestures. For
                      both patient groups, the language performance was related
                      more to the pantomime than to the imitation subscales of the
                      KAS. Data suggest that a comparable prevalence and severity
                      of apraxic deficits can be found after LH and RH stroke when
                      controlling for age and language abilities. As a
                      consequence, an apraxic work-up should be included in the
                      assessment of both LH and RH stroke patients prior to
                      neurorehabilitation.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {150},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:32325517},
      UT           = {WOS:000529218900009},
      doi          = {10.1055/a-1082-6501},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875103},
}