000875106 001__ 875106
000875106 005__ 20220930130236.0
000875106 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00797
000875106 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/24953
000875106 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:82013372
000875106 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:32425860
000875106 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000536163000001
000875106 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-01809
000875106 082__ $$a150
000875106 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aAbel, Miriam$$b0
000875106 245__ $$aGender Effects in Observation of Robotic and Humanoid Actions
000875106 260__ $$aLausanne$$bFrontiers Research Foundation$$c2020
000875106 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000875106 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000875106 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1591167369_6059
000875106 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000875106 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000875106 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000875106 520__ $$aRobots are gaining an increasingly important role in industrial production. Notably, a high level of acceptance is an important factor for co-working situation between human and robot. The aim of the present study was to investigate the differences in the perception of anthropomorphic and robotic movements using models consisting of a virtual robot and a digital human. Videos of each model displayed different degrees of human likeness or robot likeness in speed and trajectories of placing movements. Female and male participants were asked to rate on a Likert scale the perceived levels of human likeness or robot likeness in the two models. Overall, results suggest that males were sensitive to the differences between robotic and anthropomorphic movements, whereas females showed no difference between them. However compared to males, female participants attributed more anthropomorphic features to robotic movements. The study is a first step toward a more comprehensive understanding of the human ability to differentiate between anthropomorphic and robotic movements and suggests a crucial role of gender in the human-robot interaction.
000875106 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573$$a573 - Neuroimaging (POF3-573)$$cPOF3-573$$fPOF III$$x0
000875106 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000875106 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aKuz, Sinem$$b1
000875106 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPatel, Harshal J.$$b2
000875106 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPetruck, Henning$$b3
000875106 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchlick, Christopher M.$$b4
000875106 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPellicano, Antonello$$b5
000875106 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)142495$$aBinkofski, Ferdinand C.$$b6$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000875106 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2563826-9$$a10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00797$$gVol. 11, p. 797$$p797$$tFrontiers in psychology$$v11$$x1664-1078$$y2020
000875106 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875106/files/2019-0204968-6.pdf
000875106 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875106/files/2019-0204968-6.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000875106 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875106/files/fpsyg-11-00797.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000875106 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875106/files/fpsyg-11-00797.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000875106 8767_ $$82019-0204968-6$$92020-03-31$$d2020-04-24$$eAPC$$jDeposit$$lDeposit: Frontiers$$p490245$$zUSD 2507.50
000875106 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:875106$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire$$pdnbdelivery
000875106 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)142495$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b6$$kFZJ
000875106 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$vNeuroimaging$$x0
000875106 9141_ $$y2020
000875106 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000875106 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0130$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSocial Sciences Citation Index
000875106 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000875106 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bFRONT PSYCHOL : 2017
000875106 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1180$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Social and Behavioral Sciences
000875106 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal
000875106 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ
000875106 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5
000875106 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000875106 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Blind peer review
000875106 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000875106 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000875106 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0320$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bPubMed Central
000875106 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List
000875106 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406$$kINM-4$$lPhysik der Medizinischen Bildgebung$$x0
000875106 980__ $$ajournal
000875106 980__ $$aVDB
000875106 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000875106 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
000875106 980__ $$aAPC
000875106 9801_ $$aAPC
000875106 9801_ $$aFullTexts