% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Abel:875106,
      author       = {Abel, Miriam and Kuz, Sinem and Patel, Harshal J. and
                      Petruck, Henning and Schlick, Christopher M. and Pellicano,
                      Antonello and Binkofski, Ferdinand C.},
      title        = {{G}ender {E}ffects in {O}bservation of {R}obotic and
                      {H}umanoid {A}ctions},
      journal      = {Frontiers in psychology},
      volume       = {11},
      issn         = {1664-1078},
      address      = {Lausanne},
      publisher    = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-01809},
      pages        = {797},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {Robots are gaining an increasingly important role in
                      industrial production. Notably, a high level of acceptance
                      is an important factor for co-working situation between
                      human and robot. The aim of the present study was to
                      investigate the differences in the perception of
                      anthropomorphic and robotic movements using models
                      consisting of a virtual robot and a digital human. Videos of
                      each model displayed different degrees of human likeness or
                      robot likeness in speed and trajectories of placing
                      movements. Female and male participants were asked to rate
                      on a Likert scale the perceived levels of human likeness or
                      robot likeness in the two models. Overall, results suggest
                      that males were sensitive to the differences between robotic
                      and anthropomorphic movements, whereas females showed no
                      difference between them. However compared to males, female
                      participants attributed more anthropomorphic features to
                      robotic movements. The study is a first step toward a more
                      comprehensive understanding of the human ability to
                      differentiate between anthropomorphic and robotic movements
                      and suggests a crucial role of gender in the human-robot
                      interaction.},
      cin          = {INM-4},
      ddc          = {150},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406},
      pnm          = {573 - Neuroimaging (POF3-573)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-573},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:32425860},
      UT           = {WOS:000536163000001},
      doi          = {10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00797},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875106},
}