% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Cerniauskas:875142,
      author       = {Cerniauskas, Simonas and Jose Chavez Junco, Antonio and
                      Grube, Thomas and Robinius, Martin and Stolten, Detlef},
      title        = {{O}ptions of natural gas pipeline reassignment for
                      hydrogen: {C}ost assessment for a {G}ermany case study},
      journal      = {International journal of hydrogen energy},
      volume       = {45},
      number       = {21},
      issn         = {0360-3199},
      address      = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-01834},
      pages        = {12095 - 12107},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {The uncertain role of the natural gas infrastructure in the
                      decarbonized energy system and the limitations of hydrogen
                      blending raise the question of whether natural gas pipelines
                      can be economically utilized for the transport of hydrogen.
                      To investigate this question, this study derives cost
                      functions for the selected pipeline reassignment methods. By
                      applying geospatial hydrogen supply chain modeling, the
                      technical and economic potential of natural gas pipeline
                      reassignment during a hydrogen market introduction is
                      assessed.The results of this study show a technically viable
                      potential of more than $80\%$ of the analyzed representative
                      German pipeline network. By comparing the derived pipeline
                      cost functions, it could be derived that pipeline
                      reassignment can reduce the hydrogen transmission costs by
                      more than $60\%.$ Finally, a countrywide analysis of
                      pipeline availability constraints for the year 2030 shows a
                      cost reduction of the transmission system by $30\%$ in
                      comparison to a newly built hydrogen pipeline system.},
      cin          = {IEK-3},
      ddc          = {620},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013},
      pnm          = {134 - Electrolysis and Hydrogen (POF3-134)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-134},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000524161700017},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.02.121},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875142},
}