% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{KharabianMasouleh:875204,
      author       = {Kharabian Masouleh, Shahrzad and Eickhoff, Simon B and
                      Zeighami, Yashar and Lewis, Lindsay B and Dahnke, Robert and
                      Gaser, Christian and Chouinard-Decorte, Francois and Lepage,
                      Claude and Scholtens, Lianne H and Hoffstaedter, Felix and
                      Glahn, David C and Blangero, John and Evans, Alan C and
                      Genon, Sarah and Valk, Sofie L},
      title        = {{I}nfluence of {P}rocessing {P}ipeline on {C}ortical
                      {T}hickness {M}easurement},
      journal      = {Cerebral cortex},
      volume       = {30},
      number       = {9},
      issn         = {1047-3211},
      address      = {Oxford},
      publisher    = {Oxford Univ. Press},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-01872},
      pages        = {5014–5027},
      year         = {2020},
      note         = {The Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, GE 2835/1-1 and
                      EI 816/4-1), the Helmholtz Portfolio Theme “Supercomputing
                      and Modelling for the Human Brain,” and the European
                      Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme
                      under Grant Agreement No. 720270 (HBP SGA1) and Grant
                      Agreement No. 785907 (HBP SGA2).Notes},
      abstract     = {In recent years, replicability of neuroscientific findings,
                      specifically those concerning correlates of morphological
                      properties of gray matter (GM), have been subject of major
                      scrutiny. Use of different processing pipelines and
                      differences in their estimates of the macroscale GM may play
                      an important role in this context. To address this issue,
                      here, we investigated the cortical thickness estimates of
                      three widely used pipelines. Based on analyses in two
                      independent large-scale cohorts, we report high levels of
                      within-pipeline reliability of the absolute cortical
                      thickness-estimates and comparable spatial patterns of
                      cortical thickness-estimates across all pipelines. Within
                      each individual, absolute regional thickness differed
                      between pipelines, indicating that in-vivo thickness
                      measurements are only a proxy of actual thickness of the
                      cortex, which shall only be compared within the same
                      software package and thickness estimation technique.
                      However, at group level, cortical thickness-estimates
                      correlated strongly between pipelines, in most brain
                      regions. The smallest between-pipeline correlations were
                      observed in para-limbic areas and insula. These regions also
                      demonstrated the highest interindividual variability and the
                      lowest reliability of cortical thickness-estimates within
                      each pipeline, suggesting that structural variations within
                      these regions should be interpreted with caution.},
      cin          = {INM-7},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-7-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572) / SMHB -
                      Supercomputing and Modelling for the Human Brain
                      (HGF-SMHB-2013-2017) / HBP SGA2 - Human Brain Project
                      Specific Grant Agreement 2 (785907) / HBP SGA1 - Human Brain
                      Project Specific Grant Agreement 1 (720270)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572 / G:(DE-Juel1)HGF-SMHB-2013-2017 /
                      G:(EU-Grant)785907 / G:(EU-Grant)720270},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:32377664},
      UT           = {WOS:000580997100021},
      doi          = {10.1093/cercor/bhaa097},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875204},
}