guest ::
| Home > Publications database > Brain responsivity provides an individual readout for motor recovery after stroke > print |
| Home > Publications database > Brain responsivity provides an individual readout for motor recovery after stroke > print |
| 001 | 875258 | ||
| 005 | 20210130004907.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 10.1093/brain/awaa127 |2 doi |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 0006-8950 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 1460-2156 |2 ISSN |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/25305 |2 Handle |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a altmetric:81594625 |2 altmetric |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a pmid:32375172 |2 pmid |
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a WOS:000541788700030 |2 WOS |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2020-01902 |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 610 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Tscherpel, Caroline |0 P:(DE-Juel1)168559 |b 0 |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Brain responsivity provides an individual readout for motor recovery after stroke |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Oxford |c 2020 |b Oxford Univ. Press |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a article |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Journal article |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |b journal |m journal |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |s 1594995551_21583 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a ARTICLE |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE |2 ORCID |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 0 |2 EndNote |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Promoting the recovery of motor function and optimizing rehabilitation strategies for stroke patients is closely associated with the challenge of individual prediction. To date, stroke research has identified critical pathophysiological neural underpinnings at the cellular level as well as with regard to network reorganization. However, in order to generate reliable readouts at the level of individual patients and thereby realize translation from bench to bedside, we are still in a need for innovative methods. The combined use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and EEG has proven powerful to record both local and network responses at an individual’s level. To elucidate the potential of TMS-EEG to assess motor recovery after stroke, we used neuronavigated TMS-EEG over ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) in 28 stroke patients in the first days after stroke. Twenty-five of these patients were reassessed after >3 months post-stroke. In the early post-stroke phase (6.7 ± 2.5 days), the TMS-evoked EEG responses featured two markedly different response morphologies upon TMS to ipsilesional M1. In the first group of patients, TMS elicited a differentiated and sustained EEG response with a series of deflections sequentially involving both hemispheres. This response type resembled the patterns of bilateral activation as observed in the healthy comparison group. By contrast, in a subgroup of severely affected patients, TMS evoked a slow and simplified local response. Quantifying the TMS-EEG responses in the time and time-frequency domain revealed that stroke patients exhibited slower and simple responses with higher amplitudes compared to healthy controls. Importantly, these patterns of activity changes after stroke were not only linked to the initial motor deficit, but also to motor recovery after >3 months post-stroke. Thus, the data revealed a substantial impairment of local effects as well as causal interactions within the motor network early after stroke. Additionally, for severely affected patients with absent motor evoked potentials and identical clinical phenotype, TMS-EEG provided differential response patterns indicative of the individual potential for recovery of function. Thereby, TMS-EEG extends the methodological repertoire in stroke research by allowing the assessment of individual response profiles. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572 |c POF3-572 |f POF III |x 0 |
| 588 | _ | _ | |a Dataset connected to CrossRef |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Dern, Sebastian |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 1 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Hensel, Lukas |0 P:(DE-Juel1)142144 |b 2 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Ziemann, Ulf |0 P:(DE-HGF)0 |b 3 |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Fink, Gereon R |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131720 |b 4 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Grefkes, Christian |0 P:(DE-Juel1)161406 |b 5 |e Corresponding author |
| 773 | _ | _ | |a 10.1093/brain/awaa127 |g p. awaa127 |0 PERI:(DE-600)1474117-9 |n 6 |p 1873–1888 |t Brain |v 143 |y 2020 |x 1460-2156 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875258/files/awaa127.pdf |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x pdfa |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/875258/files/awaa127.pdf?subformat=pdfa |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:875258 |p openaire |p open_access |p VDB |p driver |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)131720 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 5 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)161406 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Key Technologies |l Decoding the Human Brain |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500 |v (Dys-)function and Plasticity |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2020 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200 |2 StatID |b SCOPUS |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial CC BY-NC 4.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBYNC4 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Life Sciences |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600 |2 StatID |b Ebsco Academic Search |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a JCR |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100 |2 StatID |b BRAIN : 2017 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a IF >= 10 |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9910 |2 StatID |b BRAIN : 2017 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150 |2 StatID |b Web of Science Core Collection |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a WoS |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111 |2 StatID |b Science Citation Index Expanded |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110 |2 StatID |b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030 |2 StatID |b ASC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310 |2 StatID |b NCBI Molecular Biology Database |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050 |2 StatID |b BIOSIS Previews |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300 |2 StatID |b Medline |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0320 |2 StatID |b PubMed Central |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Nationallizenz |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a DBCoverage |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199 |2 StatID |b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List |
| 920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 |k INM-3 |l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|