% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Caspari:877451,
author = {Caspari, Adrian and Offermanns, Christoph and Ecker,
Anna-Maria and Pottmann, Martin and Zapp, Gerhard and
Mhamdi, Adel and Mitsos, Alexander},
title = {{A} wave propagation approach for reduced dynamic modeling
of distillation columns: {O}ptimization and control},
journal = {Journal of process control},
volume = {91},
issn = {0959-1524},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-02204},
pages = {12 - 24},
year = {2020},
abstract = {Reduced models enable real-time optimization of large-scale
processes. We propose a reduced model of distillation
columns based on multicomponent nonlinear wave propagation
(Kienle 2000). We use a nonlinear wave equation in dynamic
mass and energy balances. We thus combine the ideas of
compartment modeling and wave propagation. In contrast to
existing reduced column models based on nonlinear wave
propagation, our model deploys a hydraulic correlation. This
enables the column holdup to change as load varies. The
model parameters can be estimated solely based on
steady-state data. The new transient wave propagation model
can be used as a controller model for flexible process
operation including load changes. To demonstrate this, we
implement full-order and reduced dynamic models of an air
separation process and multi-component distillation column
in Modelica. We use the open-source framework DyOS for the
dynamic optimizations and an Extended Kalman Filter for
state estimation. We apply the reduced model in-silico in
open-loop forward simulations as well as in several open-
and closed-loop optimization and control case studies, and
analyze the resulting computational speed-up compared to
using full-order stage-by-stage column models. The first
case study deals with tracking control of a single air
separation distillation column, whereas the second one
addresses economic model predictive control of an entire air
separation process. The reduced model is able to adequately
capture the transient column behavior. Compared to the
full-order model, the reduced model achieves highly accurate
profiles for the manipulated variables, while the
optimizations with the reduced model are significantly
faster, achieving more than $95\%$ CPU time reduction in the
closed-loop simulation and more than $96\%$ in the open-loop
optimizations. This enables the real-time capability of the
reduced model in process optimization and control.},
cin = {IEK-10},
ddc = {004},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-10-20170217},
pnm = {899 - ohne Topic (POF3-899)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-899},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000543364100002},
doi = {10.1016/j.jprocont.2020.05.004},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/877451},
}