000877588 001__ 877588
000877588 005__ 20220930130242.0
000877588 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.5194/hess-24-3057-2020
000877588 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1027-5606
000877588 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1607-7938
000877588 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/25117
000877588 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:83750702
000877588 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000541483600002
000877588 037__ $$aFZJ-2020-02310
000877588 082__ $$a550
000877588 1001_ $$00000-0002-1087-3978$$aCouvreur, Valentin$$b0$$eCorresponding author
000877588 245__ $$aDisentangling temporal and population variability in plant root water uptake from stable isotopic analysis: when rooting depth matters in labeling studies
000877588 260__ $$aKatlenburg-Lindau$$bEGU$$c2020
000877588 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000877588 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000877588 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1592766328_26607
000877588 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000877588 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000877588 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000877588 520__ $$aIsotopic labeling techniques have the potential to minimize the uncertainty of plant root water uptake (RWU) profiles estimated using multisource (statistical) modeling by artificially enhancing the soil water isotopic gradient. On the other end of the modeling continuum, physical models can account for hydrodynamic constraints to RWU if simultaneous soil and plant water status data are available.In this study, a population of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea cv. Soni) was grown in amacro-rhizotron and monitored for a 34 h long period following the oxygen stable isotopic (18O) labeling of deep soil water. Aboveground variables included tiller and leaf water oxygen isotopic compositions (δtiller and δleaf, respectively) as well as leaf water potential (ψleaf), relative humidity, and transpiration rate. Belowground profiles of root length density (RLD), soil water content, and isotopic composition were also sampled. While there were strong correlations between hydraulic variables as well as between isotopic variables, the experimental results underlined the partial disconnect between the temporal dynamics of hydraulic and isotopic variables.In order to dissect the problem, we reproduced both types of observations with a one-dimensional physical model of water flow in the soil–plant domain for 60 different realistic RLD profiles. While simulated ψleaf followed clear temporal variations with small differences across plants, as if they were “onboard the same roller coaster”, simulated δtiller values within the plant population were rather heterogeneous (“swarm-like”) with relatively little temporal variation and a strong sensitivity to rooting depth. Thus, the physical model explained the discrepancy between isotopic and hydraulic observations: the variability captured by δtiller reflected the spatial heterogeneity in the rooting depth in the soil region influenced by the labeling and may not correlate with the temporal dynamics of ψleaf. In other words, ψleaf varied in time with transpiration rate, while δtiller varied across plants with rooting depth.For comparison purposes, a Bayesian statistical model was also used to simulate RWU. While it predicted relatively similar cumulative RWU profiles, the physical model could differentiate the spatial from the temporal dynamics of the isotopic composition. An important difference between the two types of RWU models was the ability of the physical model to simulate the occurrence of hydraulic lift in order to explain concomitant increases in the soil water content and the isotopic composition observed overnight above the soil labeling region.
000877588 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x0
000877588 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef
000877588 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)145658$$aRothfuss, Youri$$b1$$eCorresponding author$$ufzj
000877588 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMeunier, Félicien$$b2
000877588 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBariac, Thierry$$b3
000877588 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBiron, Philippe$$b4
000877588 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDurand, Jean-Louis$$b5
000877588 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRichard, Patricia$$b6
000877588 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129477$$aJavaux, Mathieu$$b7$$ufzj
000877588 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2100610-6$$a10.5194/hess-24-3057-2020$$gVol. 24, no. 6, p. 3057 - 3075$$n6$$p3057 - 3075$$tHydrology and earth system sciences$$v24$$x1607-7938$$y2020
000877588 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/877588/files/Invoice_HESS-PUC-2020-164.pdf
000877588 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/877588/files/Invoice_HESS-PUC-2020-164.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa
000877588 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/877588/files/hess-24-3057-2020.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000877588 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/877588/files/hess-24-3057-2020.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000877588 8767_ $$8HESS-PUC-2020-164$$92020-06-06$$d2020-06-19$$eAPC$$jZahlung erfolgt$$phess-2019-543$$zBelegnr.  1200154105
000877588 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:877588$$popenCost$$pVDB$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pdriver$$pOpenAPC$$popen_access$$popenaire$$pdnbdelivery
000877588 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)145658$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b1$$kFZJ
000877588 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129477$$aForschungszentrum Jülich$$b7$$kFZJ
000877588 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x0
000877588 9141_ $$y2020
000877588 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS$$d2020-01-09
000877588 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0160$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bEssential Science Indicators$$d2020-01-09
000877588 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4$$2HGFVOC$$aCreative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
000877588 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR$$bHYDROL EARTH SYST SC : 2018$$d2020-01-09
000877588 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0501$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ Seal$$d2020-01-09
000877588 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0500$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bDOAJ$$d2020-01-09
000877588 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded$$d2020-01-09
000877588 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0700$$2StatID$$aFees$$d2020-01-09
000877588 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection$$d2020-01-09
000877588 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF < 5$$d2020-01-09
000877588 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000877588 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0030$$2StatID$$aPeer Review$$bDOAJ : Peer review$$d2020-01-09
000877588 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0561$$2StatID$$aArticle Processing Charges$$f2020-01-09
000877588 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences$$d2020-01-09
000877588 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline$$d2020-01-09
000877588 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bClarivate Analytics Master Journal List$$d2020-01-09
000877588 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000877588 980__ $$ajournal
000877588 980__ $$aVDB
000877588 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000877588 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000877588 980__ $$aAPC
000877588 9801_ $$aAPC
000877588 9801_ $$aFullTexts