% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Niessen:877609,
author = {Niessen, Eva and Ant, Jana M. and Bode, Stefan and Saliger,
Jochen and Karbe, Hans and Fink, Gereon R. and Stahl, Jutta
and Weiss-Blankenhorn, Peter},
title = {{P}reserved performance monitoring and error detection in
left hemisphere stroke},
journal = {NeuroImage: Clinical},
volume = {27},
issn = {2213-1582},
address = {[Amsterdam u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-02324},
pages = {102307 -},
year = {2020},
abstract = {Depending on the lesion site, a stroke typically affects
various aspects of cognitive control. While executing a
task, the performance monitoring system constantly compares
an intended action plan with the executed action and thereby
registers inaccurate actions in case of any mismatch. When
errors occur, the performance monitoring system signals the
need for more cognitive control, which is most efficient
when the subject notices errors rather than processing them
subconsciously. The current study aimed to investigate
performance monitoring and error detection in a large sample
of patients with left hemisphere (LH) stroke.In addition to
clinical and neuropsychological tests, 24 LH stroke patients
and 32 healthy age-matched controls performed a Go/Nogo task
with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) measurements.
This set-up enabled us to compare performance monitoring at
the behavioral and the neural level. EEG data were analyzed
using event-related potentials [ERPs; e.g., the
error-related negativity (Ne/ERN) and error positivity (Pe)]
and additionally more sensitive whole-brain multivariate
pattern classification analyses (MVPA). We hypothesized that
LH stroke patients would show behavioural deficits in error
detection when compared to healthy controls, mirrored by
differences in neural signals, in particular reflected in
the Pe component.Interestingly, despite clinically relevant
cognitive deficits (e.g., aphasia and apraxia) including
executive dysfunction (trail making test), we did not
observe any behavioral impairments related to performance
monitoring and error processing in the current LH stroke
patients. Patients also showed similar results for Ne/ERN
and Pe components, compared to the control group, and a
highly similar prediction of errors from multivariate
signals. ERP abnormalities during stimulus processing (i.e.,
N2 and P3) demonstrated the specificity of these findings in
the current LH stroke patients. In contrast to previous
studies, by employing a relatively large patient sample, a
well-controlled experimental paradigm with a standardized
error signaling procedure, and advanced data analysis, we
were able to show that performance monitoring (of simple
actions) is a preserved cognitive control function in LH
stroke patients that might constitute a useful resource in
rehabilitative therapies for re-learning impeded functions.},
cin = {INM-3},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
pnm = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:32570207},
UT = {WOS:000561850400010},
doi = {10.1016/j.nicl.2020.102307},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/877609},
}