% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Pennig:877663,
author = {Pennig, Lenhard and Thiele, Frank and Goertz, Lukas and
Laukamp, Kai Roman and Perkuhn, Michael and Kabbasch,
Christoph and Schlamann, Marc and Fink, Gereon Rudolf and
Borggrefe, Jan},
title = {{C}omparison of {A}ccuracy of
{A}rrival-{T}ime-{I}nsensitive and
{A}rrival-{T}ime-{S}ensitive {CTP} {A}lgorithms for
{P}rediction of {I}nfarct {T}issue {V}olumes},
journal = {Scientific reports},
volume = {10},
number = {1},
issn = {2045-2322},
address = {[London]},
publisher = {Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature},
reportid = {FZJ-2020-02373},
pages = {9252},
year = {2020},
abstract = {The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of
arrival-time-insensitive (ATI) and arrival-time-sensitive
(ATS) computed tomography perfusion (CTP) algorithms in
Philips IntelliSpace Portal (v9, ISP) and to investigate
optimal thresholds for ATI regarding the prediction of final
infarct volume (FIV). Retrospective, single-center study
with 54 patients (mean 67.0 ± 13.1 years, $68.5\%$
male) who received Stroke-CT/CTP-imaging between 2010 and
2018 with occlusion of the middle cerebral artery in the
M1-/proximal M2-segment or terminal internal carotid artery.
FIV was determined on short-term follow-up imaging in two
patient groups: A) not attempted or failed mechanical
thrombectomy (MT) and B) successful MT. ATS (default
settings) and ATI (full-range of threshold settings
regarding FIV prediction) maps were coregistered in 3D with
FIV using voxel-wise overlap measurement. Based on an
average imaging follow-up of 2.6 ± 2.1 days, the
estimation regarding penumbra (group A, ATI:
r = 0.63/0.69, ATS: r = 0.64) and infarct core
(group B, ATI: r = 0.60/0.68, ATS: r = 0.63) was
slightly higher in ATI but the effect was not significant
(p > 0.05). Regarding ATI, Tmax (AUC 0.9) was the best
estimator of the penumbra (group A), CBF relative to the
contralateral hemisphere (AUC 0.80) showed the best
estimation of the infarct core (group B). There was a broad
range of thresholds of optimal ATI settings in both groups.
Prediction of FIV with ATI was slightly better compared to
ATS. However, this difference was not significant. Since ATI
showed a broad range of optimal thresholds, exact thresholds
regarding the ATI algorithm should be evaluated in further
prospective, clinical studies.},
cin = {INM-3},
ddc = {600},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
pnm = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:32518270},
UT = {WOS:000543955500001},
doi = {10.1038/s41598-020-66041-6},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/877663},
}