% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Yang:877982,
      author       = {Yang, Danqing and Ding, Chao and Qi, Guanxiao and
                      Feldmeyer, Dirk},
      title        = {{C}holinergic and {A}denosinergic {M}odulation of
                      {S}ynaptic {R}elease},
      journal      = {Neuroscience},
      volume       = {456},
      issn         = {0306-4522},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-02556},
      pages        = {114-130},
      year         = {2021},
      abstract     = {In this review we will discuss the effect of two
                      neuromodulatory transmitters, acetylcholine (ACh) and
                      adenosine, on the synaptic release probability and
                      short-term synaptic plasticity. ACh and adenosine differ
                      fundamentally in the way they are released into the
                      extracellular space. ACh is released mostly from synaptic
                      terminals and axonal bouton of cholinergic neurons in the
                      basal forebrain. Its mode of action on synaptic release
                      probability is complex because it activate both ligand-gated
                      ion channels, so-called nicotinic ACh receptors and
                      G-protein coupled muscarinic ACh receptors. In contrast,
                      adenosine is released from both neurons and glia via
                      nucleoside transporters or diffusion over the cell membrane
                      in a non-vesicular, non-synaptic fashion; its receptors are
                      exclusively G-protein coupled receptors. We show that ACh
                      and adenosine effects are highly specific for an identified
                      synaptic connection and depend mostly on the presynaptic but
                      also on the postsynaptic receptor type and discuss the
                      functional implications of these differences.},
      cin          = {INM-10},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-10-20170113},
      pnm          = {899 - ohne Topic (POF4-899)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {32540364},
      UT           = {WOS:000617031000012},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.06.006},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/877982},
}