% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Durmus:878187,
      author       = {Durmus, Yasin Emre and Zhang, Huang and Baakes, Florian and
                      Desmaizieres, Gauthier and Hayun, Hagay and Yang, Liangtao
                      and Kolek, Martin and Küpers, Verena and Janek, Jürgen and
                      Mandler, Daniel and Passerini, Stefano and Ein‐Eli, Yair},
      title        = {{S}ide by {S}ide {B}attery {T}echnologies with
                      {L}ithium‐{I}on {B}ased {B}atteries},
      journal      = {Advanced energy materials},
      volume       = {10},
      number       = {24},
      issn         = {1614-6840},
      address      = {Weinheim},
      publisher    = {Wiley-VCH},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-02675},
      pages        = {2000089 -},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {In recent years, the electrochemical power sources
                      community has launched massive research programs,
                      conferences, and workshops on the “post Li battery era.”
                      However, in this report it is shown that the quest for post
                      Li‐ion and Li battery technologies is incorrect in its
                      essence. This is the outcome of a three day discussion on
                      the future technologies that could provide an answer to a
                      question that many ask these days: Which are the
                      technologies that can be regarded as alternative to Li‐ion
                      batteries? The answer to this question is a rather
                      surprising one: Li‐ion battery technology will be here for
                      many years to come, and therefore the use of “post
                      Li‐ion” battery technologies would be misleading.
                      However, there are applications with needs for which
                      Li‐ion batteries will not be able to provide complete
                      technological solutions, as well as lower cost and
                      sustainability. In these specific cases, other battery
                      technologies will play a key role. Here, the term
                      “side‐by‐side technologies” is coined alongside a
                      discussion of its meaning. The progress report does not
                      cover the topic of Li‐metal battery technologies, but
                      covers the technologies of sodium‐ion, multivalent,
                      metal–air, and flow batteries.},
      cin          = {IEK-9},
      ddc          = {050},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-9-20110218},
      pnm          = {131 - Electrochemical Storage (POF3-131)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-131},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000529915900001},
      doi          = {10.1002/aenm.202000089},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878187},
}