% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Luu:878301,
      author       = {Luu, Thomas and Meißner, Ulf-G.},
      title        = {{M}isconceptions on {E}ffective {F}ield {T}heories and
                      {S}pontaneous {S}ymmetry {B}reaking: {R}esponse to
                      {E}llis’ {A}rticle},
      journal      = {Foundations of physics},
      volume       = {50},
      number       = {10},
      issn         = {0015-9018},
      address      = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V.},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2020-02764},
      pages        = {1140 - 1151},
      year         = {2020},
      abstract     = {In an earlier paper Luu and Meißner (arXiv:1910.13770
                      [physics.hist-ph]) we discussed emergence from the context
                      of effective field theories, particularly as related to the
                      fields of particle and nuclear physics. We argued on the
                      side of reductionism and weak emergence. George Ellis has
                      critiqued our exposition in Ellis (arXiv:2004.13591
                      [physics.hist-ph]), and here we provide our response to his
                      critiques. Many of his critiques are based on incorrect
                      assumptions related to the formalism of effective field
                      theories and we attempt to correct these issues here. We
                      also comment on other statements made in his paper.
                      Important to note is that our response is to his critiques
                      made in archive versions arXiv:2004.13591v1-5
                      [physics.hist-ph]. That is, versions 1–5 of this archive
                      post. Version 6 has similar content as versions 1–5, but
                      versions 7–9 are seemingly a different paper altogether
                      (even with a different title).},
      cin          = {IAS-4 / IKP-3},
      ddc          = {530},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-4-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)VDB25},
      pnm          = {574 - Theory, modelling and simulation (POF3-574)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000560626600002},
      doi          = {10.1007/s10701-020-00368-y},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878301},
}