001     878301
005     20220930130247.0
024 7 _ |2 doi
|a 10.1007/s10701-020-00368-y
024 7 _ |2 Handle
|a 2128/26243
024 7 _ |2 altmetric
|a altmetric:86154800
024 7 _ |a WOS:000560626600002
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-02764
082 _ _ |a 530
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)159481
|a Luu, Thomas
|b 0
|e Corresponding author
245 _ _ |a Misconceptions on Effective Field Theories and Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking: Response to Ellis’ Article
260 _ _ |a New York, NY [u.a.]
|b Springer Science + Business Media B.V.
|c 2020
336 7 _ |2 DRIVER
|a article
336 7 _ |2 DataCite
|a Output Types/Journal article
336 7 _ |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|s 1605807982_32252
336 7 _ |2 BibTeX
|a ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 ORCID
|a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
336 7 _ |0 0
|2 EndNote
|a Journal Article
520 _ _ |a In an earlier paper Luu and Meißner (arXiv:1910.13770 [physics.hist-ph]) we discussed emergence from the context of effective field theories, particularly as related to the fields of particle and nuclear physics. We argued on the side of reductionism and weak emergence. George Ellis has critiqued our exposition in Ellis (arXiv:2004.13591 [physics.hist-ph]), and here we provide our response to his critiques. Many of his critiques are based on incorrect assumptions related to the formalism of effective field theories and we attempt to correct these issues here. We also comment on other statements made in his paper. Important to note is that our response is to his critiques made in archive versions arXiv:2004.13591v1-5 [physics.hist-ph]. That is, versions 1–5 of this archive post. Version 6 has similar content as versions 1–5, but versions 7–9 are seemingly a different paper altogether (even with a different title).
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574
|a 574 - Theory, modelling and simulation (POF3-574)
|c POF3-574
|f POF III
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131252
|a Meißner, Ulf-G.
|b 1
|u fzj
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)1470577-1
|a 10.1007/s10701-020-00368-y
|g Vol. 50, no. 10, p. 1140 - 1151
|n 10
|p 1140 - 1151
|t Foundations of physics
|v 50
|x 0015-9018
|y 2020
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878301/files/Luu-Mei%C3%9Fner2020_Article_MisconceptionsOnEffectiveField.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878301/files/Luu-Mei%C3%9Fner2020_Article_MisconceptionsOnEffectiveField.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:878301
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC_DEAL
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)159481
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 0
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131252
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|b 1
|k FZJ
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-574
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|v Theory, modelling and simulation
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|a WoS
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
|d 2020-01-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b SCOPUS
|d 2020-01-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0160
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Essential Science Indicators
|d 2020-01-17
915 _ _ |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
|a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0600
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Ebsco Academic Search
|d 2020-01-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
|d 2020-01-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Web of Science Core Collection
|d 2020-01-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|a WoS
|b Science Citation Index
|d 2020-01-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)3002
|2 StatID
|a DEAL Springer
|d 2020-01-17
|w ger
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|a IF < 5
|d 2020-01-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
|a OpenAccess
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|a Peer Review
|b ASC
|d 2020-01-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|a JCR
|b FOUND PHYS : 2018
|d 2020-01-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Medline
|d 2020-01-17
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|a Nationallizenz
|d 2020-01-17
|w ger
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Clarivate Analytics Master Journal List
|d 2020-01-17
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-4-20090406
|k IAS-4
|l Theorie der Starken Wechselwirkung
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)VDB25
|k IKP-3
|l Institut 3 (Theoretische Kernphysik)
|x 1
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-4-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)VDB25
980 _ _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21