001     878396
005     20220930130248.0
024 7 _ |a 10.3390/fire3030033
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 2128/25642
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a altmetric:88122021
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a WOS:000697569800008
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2020-02832
082 _ _ |a 570
100 1 _ |a Hehnen, Tristan
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)174283
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Numerical Fire Spread Simulation Based on Material Pyrolysis—An Application to the CHRISTIFIRE Phase 1 Horizontal Cable Tray Tests
260 _ _ |a Basel
|c 2020
|b MDPI
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1617695711_23317
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a A general procedure is described to generate material parameter sets to simulate fire propagation in horizontal cable tray installations. Cone Calorimeter test data are processed in an inverse modelling approach. Here, parameter sets are generated procedurally and serve as input for simulations conducted with the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS). The simulation responses are compared with the experimental data and ranked based on their fitness. The best fitness was found for a test condition of 50 kW/m2. Low flux conditions 25 kW/m2 and less exhibited difficulties to be accurately simulated. As a validation step, the best parameter sets are then utilised to simulate fire propagation within a horizontal cable tray installation and are compared with experimental data. It is important to note, the inverse modelling process is focused on the Cone Calorimeter and not aware of the actual validation step. Despite this handicap, the general features in the fire development can be reproduced, however not exact. The fire in the tray simulation extinguishes earlier and the total energy release is slightly higher when compared to the experiment. The responses of the material parameter sets are briefly compared with a selection of state of the art procedures.
536 _ _ |a 511 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods (POF3-511)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511
|c POF3-511
|f POF III
|x 0
536 _ _ |a PhD no Grant - Doktorand ohne besondere Förderung (PHD-NO-GRANT-20170405)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)PHD-NO-GRANT-20170405
|c PHD-NO-GRANT-20170405
|x 1
536 _ _ |a Pyrolysis Modeling (jjsc27_20190501)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)jjsc27_20190501
|c jjsc27_20190501
|f Pyrolysis Modeling
|x 2
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef
700 1 _ |a Arnold, Lukas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)132044
|b 1
|e Corresponding author
700 1 _ |a La Mendola, Saverio
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
773 _ _ |a 10.3390/fire3030033
|g Vol. 3, no. 3, p. 33 -
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2924038-4
|n 3
|p 33
|t Fire
|v 3
|y 2020
|x 2571-6255
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878396/files/Invoice_fire-861992.pdf
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878396/files/Invoice_fire-861992.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878396/files/fire-03-00033-v2.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/878396/files/fire-03-00033-v2.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:878396
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p OpenAPC
|p driver
|p VDB
|p openCost
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)174283
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)132044
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Supercomputing & Big Data
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-510
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v Computational Science and Mathematical Methods
|x 0
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-890
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-899
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF4
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF4-800
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|v ohne Topic
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2020
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 4.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY4
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0501
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ Seal
|d 2020-01-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
|d 2020-01-02
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0030
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ : Blind peer review
|d 2020-01-02
915 _ _ |a Article Processing Charges
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0561
|2 StatID
|f 2020-01-02
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
|d 2020-01-02
915 _ _ |a Fees
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0700
|2 StatID
|d 2020-01-02
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321
|k IAS-7
|l Zivile Sicherheitsforschung
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-82)080012_20140620
|k JARA-HPC
|l JARA - HPC
|x 1
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-7-20180321
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-82)080012_20140620
980 _ _ |a APC
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 1 _ |a APC
980 1 _ |a FullTexts


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21